E

E. S. Casper

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publishes on Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology, Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations. 37 papers and 3.4k citations.

37Publications
3.4kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma.
Peter W. T. Pisters, L.B. Harrison, Denis H. Y. Leung et al.|Journal of Clinical Oncology|1996
Cited by 999Open Access

PURPOSE: This trial was performed to evaluate the impact of adjuvant brachytherapy on local and systemic recurrence rates in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a single-institution prospective randomized trial, 164 patients were randomized intraoperatively to receive either adjuvant brachytherapy (BRT) or no further therapy (no BRT) after complete resection of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity or superficial trunk. The adjuvant radiation was administered by iridium-192 implant, which delivered 42 to 45 Gy over 4 to 6 days. The two study groups had comparable distributions of patient and tumor factors, including age, sex, tumor site, tumor size, and histologic type and grade. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 76 months, the 5-year actuarial local control rates were 82% and 69% in the BRT and no BRT groups (P = .04), respectively. Patients with high-grade lesions had local control rates of 89% (BRT) and 66% (no BRT) (P = .0025). BRT had no impact on local control in patients with low-grade lesions (P = .49). The 5-year freedom-from-distant-recurrence rates were 83% and 76% in the BRT and no BRT groups (P = .60), respectively. Analysis by histologic grade did not demonstrate an impact of BRT on the development of distant metastasis, despite the improvement in local control noted in patients with high-grade lesions. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates for the BRT and no BRT groups were 84% and 81% (P = .65), respectively, with no impact of BRT regardless of tumor grade. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant brachytherapy improves local control after complete resection of soft tissue sarcomas. This improvement in local control is limited to patients with high-grade histopathology. The reduction in local recurrence in patients with high-grade lesions is not associated with a significant reduction in distant metastasis or improvement in disease-specific survival.

Intensification of preoperative chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma: results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering (T12) protocol.
Paul A. Meyers, Richard Görlick, Glenn Heller et al.|Journal of Clinical Oncology|1998
Cited by 297

PURPOSE: It has been observed previously in osteosarcoma (OS) that the degree of necrosis of the resected primary tumor following a period of preoperative chemotherapy is predictive of subsequent event-free survival (EFS). The aim of this study was to determine if more intensive preoperative chemotherapy would increase the proportion of patients with a good histologic response and improve EFS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients with OS were treated at Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on the T12 protocol between 1986 and 1993. Patients were randomized between therapy based on the T10 protocol and therapy with more intensive preoperative chemotherapy. The more intensive preoperative regimen consisted of two courses of cisplatin (CDDP) and doxorubicin (DOX) in addition to the usual preoperative regimen of high-dose methotrexate (HD MTX) and bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (BCD). RESULTS: The regimen with more intensive preoperative chemotherapy achieved a modest increase in the proportion of patients with a good histologic response (44% with a grade III or IV histologic response v 37% in the control arm, 33% with grade IV histologic response v 13% in the control arm). EFS continued to correlate with histologic response. The actuarial 5-year EFS in patients with localized disease was 78% for the regimen with more intensive preoperative chemotherapy and 73% for the control arm. CONCLUSION: Despite modest increases in the proportion of patients with good histologic response with intensified preoperative chemotherapy, no improvement in EFS was observed.

Refinement of clinicopathologic staging for localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: a study of 423 adults.
Jeffrey J. Gaynor, Charlotte C. Tan, E. S. Casper et al.|Journal of Clinical Oncology|1992
Cited by 270

PURPOSE: The prognostic value of factors used in clinicopathologic staging of localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity were analyzed comprehensively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty-three patients with STS that was confined to the extremity were admitted to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1968 to 1978. Cox models for the hazards rates of tumor mortality, development of a distant metastasis, strictly local recurrence, and postmetastasis survival were developed. Tests of changes in the prognostic value of the important variables over time were performed, as well as an analysis of the effect of a local recurrence on the hazard rate of distant metastasis. RESULTS: Three unfavorable characteristics contained independent prognostic value for the rates of distant metastasis and tumor mortality: high grade (P less than .00001), deep location (P less than .0002), and size greater than or equal to 5 cm (P less than .007). Their Cox model coefficients did not differ significantly (P greater than or equal to .65); thus, a staging scheme based on the risk of ever developing a distant metastasis would assign equal prognostic weights to grade, depth, and size. The tumor grade effect during the initial 18 months was much larger in magnitude than those for depth and size, and its effect disappeared beyond that time (P = .0003). Thus, a staging scheme based on the risk of early metastatic spread would assign a distinctly larger prognostic weight to grade and lesser but equal weights to depth and size. There was no local recurrence effect on the rate of distant metastasis in the high-risk group (high grade, deep, and greater than or equal to 5 cm; P = .75), but there was a significant association among the remaining groups combined (P = .0039). The magnitude of this association actually increased according to the number of favorable characteristics presented (P = .0024). CONCLUSIONS: The refinement of clinicopathologic staging may depend on the choice of outcome variable: ultimate prognosis versus early metastatic spread. Additionally, the observed local recurrence effect may be explained by a tendency for some patients to acquire one or more unfavorable risk factors at the time of local recurrence.

A prospective randomized comparison of epirubicin and doxorubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer.
K K Jain, E. S. Casper, Nancy L. Geller et al.|Journal of Clinical Oncology|1985
Cited by 248

Fifty-four patients with advanced breast cancer who had failed prior non-anthracycline combination chemotherapy were randomized to treatment with either epirubicin 85 mg/m2 or doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 intravenously every three weeks. Of 52 evaluable patients, 25% (six of 24) treated with epirubicin, and 25% (seven of 28) treated with doxorubicin experienced major therapeutic responses. The median duration of response to epirubicin was 11.9 months compared to 7.1 months with doxorubicin. Cardiotoxicity was monitored by serial multigated radionuclide cineangiocardiography performed at rest and after exercise. Laboratory evidence of cardiotoxicity was defined as a decrease in resting left ventricular ejection fraction of greater than 10% from the baseline value, or a decrease of 5% or greater with exercise compared with the resting study performed on the same day. Fifteen patients treated with epirubicin and 18 patients treated with doxorubicin had at least two determinations of left ventricular ejection fraction and were evaluable for laboratory cardiotoxicity. Using methods of survival analysis, the median doses to the development of laboratory cardiotoxicity were estimated to be 935 mg/m2 of epirubicin and 468 mg/m2 of doxorubicin. Four patients treated with epirubicin and five treated with doxorubicin developed symptomatic congestive heart failure. The median cumulative dose at which congestive heart failure occurred was 1,134 mg/m2 of epirubicin compared with 492 mg/m2 of doxorubicin. Fewer episodes of nausea and vomiting were observed in patients receiving epirubicin. Epirubicin is a new anthracycline with reduced cardiac toxicity, but preserved efficacy in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer.