Claire Davies

BACKGROUND: Data suggest that the adjuvant use of bisphosphonates reduces rates of recurrence and death in patients with early-stage breast cancer. We conducted a study to determine whether treatment with zoledronic acid, in addition to standard adjuvant therapy, would improve disease outcomes in such patients. METHODS: In this open-label phase 3 study, we randomly assigned 3360 patients to receive standard adjuvant systemic therapy either with or without zoledronic acid. The zoledronic acid was administered every 3 to 4 weeks for 6 doses and then every 3 to 6 months to complete 5 years of treatment. The primary end point of the study was disease-free survival. A second interim analysis revealed that a prespecified boundary for lack of benefit had been crossed. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 59 months, there was no significant between-group difference in the primary end point, with a rate of disease-free survival of 77% in each group (adjusted hazard ratio in the zoledronic acid group, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.13; P = 0.79). Disease recurrence or death occurred in 377 patients in the zoledronic acid group and 375 of those in the control group. The numbers of deaths - 243 in the zoledronic acid group and 276 in the control group - were also similar, resulting in rates of overall survival of 85.4% in the zoledronic acid group and 83.1% in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.01; P = 0.07). In the zoledronic acid group, there were 17 confirmed cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw (cumulative incidence, 1.1%; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.7; P < 0.001) and 9 suspected cases; there were no cases in the control group. Rates of other adverse effects were similar in the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the routine use of zoledronic acid in the adjuvant management of breast cancer.

1. We have investigated the effects of moderate long-term exercise on protein turnover in fed man by measuring the extent of whole-body nitrogen production, the labelling of urinary ammonia from ingested [15N]glycine and plasma, muscle and urine free amino acid concentrations. 2. Judged both from nitrogen production, and from the extent of 13CO2 production from ingested L-[1-13C]leucine, exercise causes a substantial rise in amino acid catabolism. 3. Amino acids catabolized during exercise appear to become available through a fall in whole-body protein synthesis and a rise in whole-body protein breakdown. After exercise, protein balance becomes positive through a rise in the rate of whole-body synthesis in excess of breakdown. 4. Studies of free 3-methylhistidine in muscle, plasma and urine samples suggest that exercise decreases the fractional rate of myofibrillar protein breakdown, in contrast with the apparent rise in whole-body breakdown.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) tocilizumab (TCZ) versus intravenous (IV) TCZ, including switching formulations, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: Patients (n=1262) were randomised 1:1 to receive TCZ-SC 162 mg weekly (qw)+placebo-IV every four weeks (q4w) or TCZ-IV 8 mg/kg q4w+placebo-SC qw in combination with DMARD(s). After a 24-week double-blind period, patients receiving TCZ-SC were re-randomised 11:1 to TCZ-SC (n=521) or TCZ-IV (TCZ-SC-IV, n=48), and patients receiving TCZ-IV were re-randomised 2:1 to TCZ-IV (n=372) or TCZ-SC (TCZ-IV-SC; n=186). Maintenance of clinical responses and safety through week 97 were assessed. RESULTS: The proportions of patients who achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70 responses, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints remission and improvement from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index ≥0.3 were sustained through week 97 and comparable across arms. TCZ-SC had a comparable safety profile to TCZ-IV through week 97, except that injection site reactions (ISRs) were more common with TCZ-SC. Safety profiles in patients who switched were similar to those in patients who received continuous TCZ-SC or TCZ-IV treatment. The proportion of patients who developed anti-TCZ antibodies remained low across treatment arms. No association between anti-TCZ antibody development and clinical response or adverse events was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term efficacy and safety of TCZ-SC was maintained and comparable to that of TCZ-IV, except for ISRs. Profiles in patients who switched formulations were comparable to those in patients who received TCZ-IV or TCZ-SC. TCZ-SC provides additional treatment options for patients with RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01194414.

Abstract Background: The ABCSG XII trial demonstrated a 32% risk reduction in disease-free survival (DFS) events with Zoledronic acid (ZOL) use in a cohort of premenopausal women treated with endocrine therapy at 62 months median follow-up .[1,2] This strategy is increasingly being adopted in the wider breast cancer population. The AZURE trial is an academic study designed to determine whether treatment with ZOL added to standard adjuvant therapy improves DFS and bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS) in a broader range of patients with stage II/III breast cancer. Materials and methods: 3360 patients from 174 centres were randomized to receive (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and/or endocrine therapy (ET) +/− ZOL 4mg iv every 3-4 weeks for 6 doses, then 3 monthly x 8 and 6 monthly x 5 to complete 5 years treatment. The primary DFS endpoint was to be determined after 940 DFS events, providing 80% power to detect a 17% reduction in hazard rates (HR) for DFS events. The rate of events on study has been slower than expected, resulting in an estimated final analysis in 2012. In light of the clinical interest in the results of AZURE, the DMEC has agreed to a second interim analysis after 705 events with boundaries set by an independent statistician, unaware of results at the first interim analysis, for both efficacy (HR ∼0.82, alpha spend 1%) and lack of clinical benefit (HR ∼0.935 with a 5% risk of declaring a false negative result). Contingent on DMEC advice, efficacy results that breach either boundary will be presented. A DMEC recommendation not to release the results at the second interim analysis may indicate that the point HR estimate lies between these boundaries. Results: Patient characteristics including stage, number of positive axillary nodes, CT type, ER status, menopausal status and statin use were well balanced. 3208 patients (96%) received (neo) adjuvant CT (93% anthracyclines, 23% taxanes). 152 patients received ET alone. As of June 9th 2010, with a median follow up of 49 (IQR 42-56) months, there have been 695 DFS events. The safety population comprised 3340 patients (ZOL 1665; control 1675). The addition of ZOL to standard treatment did not significantly impact on chemotherapy delivery. Serious adverse events (SAE) were similar in both treatment arms. To date 13 confirmed (0.83%; 95% CI 0.38%, 1.28%) and 12 possible (1.12%; 95% CI 0.39%, 1.85%) cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in the ZOL arm have occurred. Discussion: AZURE is one of the largest phase III studies of adjuvant bisphosphonates, and the results from this study will help define the role of adjuvant ZOL in the management of early breast cancer. [1] Gnant M et al. NEJM 2009; 360(7):679-691 [2] Gnant M et al. ASCO 2010 Proceedings; abs #533. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S4-5.