Jeremy Wegner

We describe analysis of zebrafish distal-less-related homeobox genes that may serve as specifiers of positional information in anterior regions of the CNS and in peripheral structures. We isolated three zebrafish genes, dlx2, dlx3, and dlx4, by screening embryonic cDNA libraries. Comparisons of the predicted sequences of the Dlx2, Dlx3, and Dlx4 proteins with distal-less proteins from other species suggest that vertebrate distal-less genes can be divided into four orthologous groups. We observed similarities but also unique features of the expression patterns of the zebrafish dlx genes. Among the three genes, dlx3 alone is expressed during gastrulation. Shortly after gastrulation, cells in the ventral forebrain rudiment express dlx2 and dlx4, but not dlx3, and hindbrain neural crest cells express only dlx2. Presumptive precursor cells of the olfactory placodes express dlx3 and dlx4 but not dlx2. Transcripts of dlx3 and dlx4 are present in overlapping subsets of cells in the auditory vesicle and in cells of the median fin fold, whereas dlx2 is never expressed in the auditory vesicle and only at low levels in localized regions of the median fin fold. Cells of the visceral arches and their primordia express all three dlx genes, but with different developmental time courses. We suggest that combinatorial expression of the dlx genes is part of a homeobox gene code specifying pattern formation or cell fate determination in the forebrain, in peripheral structures of the head, and in the fins.

We have identified three genes, expressed in zebrafish embryos, that are members of the engrailed gene family. On the basis of sequence comparisons and analyses of their expression patterns, we suggest that two of these genes, eng2 and eng3, are closely related to the En-2 gene of other vertebrates. The third gene, eng1, is probably the zebrafish homolog of En-1. Subsets of cells at the developing junction between the midbrain and hindbrain express three different combinations of these genes, revealing a previously unknown complexity of this region of the CNS. Other cells, for example, jaw and myotomal muscle precursors, express two of the three genes in combinations which, in the myotomal muscles, change during development. Cells in the developing hindbrain and fins express only a single engrailed gene. We propose that the fates and patterning of these cells may be regulated by the coordinate expression of particular combinations of these closely related homeoproteins.

A currently favored hypothesis postulates that a single field of cells in the neural plate forms bilateral retinas. To learn how retinal precursors segregate, we followed individual labeled neural plate cells in zebrafish. In the late gastrula, a single field of odd-paired-like-expressing cells contributed to both retinas, bordered posteriorly by diencephalic precursors expressing mariposa. Median mariposa-expressing cells moved anteriorly, separating the eyes, and formed ventral anterior diencephalon, the presumptive hypothalamus. In cyclops mutants, corresponding cells failed to move anteriorly, a ventral diencephalon never formed, and the eyes remained fused. Ablation of the region containing these cells induced cyclopia in wild types. Our results indicate that movement of a median subpopulation of diencephalic precursors separates retinal precursors into left and right eyes. Wild-type cyclops gene function is required for these morphogenetic movements.

Caveolae are an abundant feature of many animal cells. However, the exact function of caveolae remains unclear. We have used the zebrafish, Danio rerio, as a system to understand caveolae function focusing on the muscle-specific caveolar protein, caveolin-3 (Cav3). We have identified caveolin-1 (alpha and beta), caveolin-2 and Cav3 in the zebrafish. Zebrafish Cav3 has 72% identity to human CAV3, and the amino acids altered in human muscle diseases are conserved in the zebrafish protein. During embryonic development, cav3 expression is apparent by early segmentation stages in the first differentiating muscle precursors, the adaxial cells and slightly later in the notochord. cav3 expression appears in the somites during mid-segmentation stages and then later in the pectoral fins and facial muscles. Cav3 and caveolae are located along the entire sarcolemma of late stage embryonic muscle fibers, whereas beta-dystroglycan is restricted to the muscle fiber ends. Down-regulation of Cav3 expression causes gross muscle abnormalities and uncoordinated movement. Ultrastructural analysis of isolated muscle fibers reveals defects in myoblast fusion and disorganized myofibril and membrane systems. Expression of the zebrafish equivalent to a human muscular dystrophy mutant, CAV3P104L, causes severe disruption of muscle differentiation. In addition, knockdown of Cav3 resulted in a dramatic up-regulation of eng1a expression resulting in an increase in the number of muscle pioneer-like cells adjacent to the notochord. These studies provide new insights into the role of Cav3 in muscle development and demonstrate its requirement for correct intracellular organization and myoblast fusion.

Social work, in addition to many other professions, remains very concerned with resolving and preventing various problems associated with sexuality. Social workers commonly may be involved in treating victims and perpetrators of sexual abuse, dealing with client personal issues concerning sexuality and sexual functioning, and advocating for policies that empower and protect individuals who are vulnerable. Sociosexual issues are serious and may affect many people, thus it is necessary to explore important possibilities of addressing such issues effectively. It appears that considering a broad “sex-positive” approach from which to understand sexuality may be useful in helping to resolve major sociosexual problems. Despite its potential benefits, a sex-positive approach has yet to be substantively used in social work. In his classic work addressing sexual variation, Bullough (1976) considered societies as being sex positive or sex negative. Sex-negative societies encourage sexual asceticism, and sex is largely constructed as being particularly risky, problematic, or perhaps adversarial. Sex negativity is linked not only to prejudices associated with various sexual practices, but also to sexism, racism, homophobia, and ageism (Glickman, 2000). However, a sex-positive approach is more encompassing; it also emphasizes the pleasurable, rewarding, and nonprocreative aspects of sex. A sex-positive approach recognizes the tremendous cultural diversity in sexual practices (see Bullough, 1976; Popovic, 2006), while also acknowledging substantial variation in personal meanings and preferences. In discussing sexual diversity, it has been noted that, too often, cultural forces are given “lip service” but not serious attention in understanding sexual practices (Bhugra, Popelyuk, & McMullen, 2010).