Karsten Kern

This manuscript presents practical recommendations for managing acute attacks and implementing preventive immunotherapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), a rare autoimmune disease that causes severe inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), primarily affecting the optic nerves, spinal cord, and brainstem. The pillars of NMOSD therapy are attack treatment and attack prevention to minimize the accrual of neurological disability. Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG) are a diagnostic marker of the disease and play a significant role in its pathogenicity. Recent advances in understanding NMOSD have led to the development of new therapies and the completion of randomized controlled trials. Four preventive immunotherapies have now been approved for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD in many regions of the world: eculizumab, ravulizumab - most recently-, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. These new drugs may potentially substitute rituximab and classical immunosuppressive therapies, which were as yet the mainstay of treatment for both, AQP4-IgG-positive and -negative NMOSD. Here, the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) provides an overview of the current state of knowledge on NMOSD treatments and offers statements and practical recommendations on the therapy management and use of all available immunotherapies for this disease. Unmet needs and AQP4-IgG-negative NMOSD are also discussed. The recommendations were developed using a Delphi-based consensus method among the core author group and at expert discussions at NEMOS meetings.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are associated with a high burden of depression, pain, and physical disability, all of which significantly impair quality of life. At the same time, discussions on the cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies are gaining importance. However, it is not yet known whether specific symptom burdens are particularly cost-driving. This study aims to provide a comprehensive cost analysis considering depression and pain to optimise future healthcare strategies. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional multicentre study was conducted at twelve centres of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Over a three-year period, 115 NMOSD patients were recruited. Disease-related costs, pain, and depression were assessed using standardised questionnaires. A generalised linear model analysis and graphical sub-cost analysis were performed to identify key cost drivers. The robustness of our findings was confirmed using two independent depression rating scales. RESULTS: In our sample of 115 patients, 77% suffered from chronic pain with a median pain intensity of 4.0 on the numeric rating scale (NRS). Moreover, 56% of patients reported depressive symptoms. In multivariate regression analysis, depression emerged as a significant predictor of total costs (p < 0.001) alongside the EDSS score (p < 0.001) and age (p = 0.004). In contrast, pain was not significantly influencing total costs (p = 0.057), despite being reported by the majority of patients. Graphical analyses highlighted informal costs as the main cost driver in patients with increasing depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms are not only common in NMOSD patients but also represent a major cost driver alongside neurological disability. Addressing these symptoms is essential for optimal patient care and may help reduce the socioeconomic burden.