Kjell E. Kjørstad

The risk of cancer associated with a broad range of organ doses was estimated in an international study of women with cervical cancer. Among 150,000 patients reported to one of 19 population-based cancer registries or treated in any of 20 oncology clinics, 4188 women with second cancers and 6880 matched controls were selected for detailed study. Radiation doses for selected organs were reconstructed for each patient on the basis of her original radiotherapy records. Very high doses, on the order of several hundred gray, were found to increase the risk of cancers of the bladder [relative risk (RR) = 4.0], rectum (RR = 1.8), vagina (RR = 2.7), and possibly bone (RR = 1.3), uterine corpus (RR = 1.3), cecum (RR = 1.5), and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (RR = 2.5). For all female genital cancers taken together, a sharp dose-response gradient was observed, reaching fivefold for doses more than 150 Gy. Several gray increased the risk of stomach cancer (RR = 2.1) and leukemia (RR = 2.0). Although cancer of the pancreas was elevated, there was no evidence of a dose-dependent risk. Cancer of the kidney was significantly increased among 15-year survivors. A nonsignificant twofold risk of radiogenic thyroid cancer was observed following an average dose of only 0.11 Gy. Breast cancer was not increased overall, despite an average dose of 0.31 Gy and 953 cases available for evaluation (RR = 0.9); there was, however, a weak suggestion of a dose response among women whose ovaries had been surgically removed. Doses greater than 6 Gy to the ovaries reduced breast cancer risk by 44%. A significant deficit of ovarian cancer was observed within 5 years of radiotherapy; in contrast, a dose response was suggested among 10-year survivors. Radiation was not found to increase the overall risk of cancers of the small intestine, colon, ovary, vulva, connective tissue, breast, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia. For most cancers associated with radiation, risks were highest among long-term survivors and appeared concentrated among women irradiated at relatively younger ages.

BACKGROUND: Small cell carcinoma of the cervix is a rare and aggressive tumor. Most gynecologic oncology centers have little experience with this tumor, and only small series have been published. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix were treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Clinical data, immunohistochemical characteristics, and infection with human papillomavirus were studied. RESULTS: Twelve tumors were of oat cell type and 14 of intermediate cell type. Twelve tumors were associated with other forms of carcinoma: squamous cell carcinoma (6 tumors), adenocarcinoma (5 tumors), and adenocarcinoma in situ (1 tumor). Neuroendocrine differentiation was expressed in 79% of the tumors. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-18 was detected in 40% of the tumors and HPV-16 in 28%. Fifteen patients had Stage I disease, 7 had Stage II, 2 had Stage III, and 3 had Stage IV. Fourteen patients with Stage I and II disease underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. In four, the operation was preceded by intracavitary radiation treatment. The patients with Stage II, III, and IV disease were treated with a combination of intracavitary radium, external beam radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The 5-year survival rate was 14%. Four patients are alive, one with recurrent disease 50 months after diagnosis. Three patients free of disease have been followed up 26, 54, and 101 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Small cell carcinoma of the cervix is an aggressive tumor with a propensity for rapid recurrence; it is associated with high mortality.

Fifteen hundred sixty-six patients with adenocarcinoma of the endometrioid type (AC) were studied. These accounted for 78.9% of all 1985 patients with confirmed endometrial carcinoma diagnosed in Norway in the period 1970 through 1978. Four hundred and sixty-nine patients (29.9%) had well-differentiated tumors, 677 (43.2%) were moderately and 420 (26.8%) poorly differentiated. Eighty-one percent of the patients had surgicopathologic Stage I disease, 11% Stage II, 6% Stage III, and 2% Stage IV. Mean age at diagnosis was 62.1 years (range, 36 to 91). The crude 5-year and 10-year survival rates for all patients were 74.1% and 62.2%, respectively. Five-year crude survival was 86.8% for Grade 1 and 58.3% for Grade 3 tumors. The 5-year crude survival for patients with intramucosal tumors was 88.7% as opposed to 46.9% for patients with tumors infiltrating to the serosa. Sixty-six percent of the patients with vessel invasion survived for 5 years in contrast to 88.6% for patients without vessel invasion. Histologic grade, myometrial infiltration, vessel invasion, and lymphocyte reaction surrounding the tumor were strongly interrelated. Multivariate analysis showed that the age of the patient at the time of diagnosis was the most important single prognostic factor. Disregarding age, survival in operated patients was more dependent on the depth of myometrial invasion than on grade and stage of disease.

In this study, 347 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer without residual tumor after primary laparotomy, were assigned randomly to receive either intraperitoneal instillation of radioactive phosphorus (32P) or six courses of cisplatin (50 mg/m2). Patients randomized to receive 32P with extensive intraperitoneal adhesions were treated with whole-abdomen irradiation instead of 32P (n = 28). The median follow-up was 62 months. Crude and disease-free survival were similar in all groups. Late bowel complications occurred more often in patients treated with 32P compared with the cisplatin group. The estimated 5-year crude survival rate was as high as 95% in patients with borderline or well-differentiated tumors in Stage I. It is suggested that these patients can be treated adequately by operation alone. Patients with moderately or poorly differentiated cancers in Stage I disease had a 5-year crude survival rate of 75%. In these patients, the relapse risk was high enough to warrant postoperative treatment. The efficacy of adjuvant treatment in this subgroup of patients can only be established in a prospective randomized study comparing postoperative adjuvant treatment with a no-treatment arm. Because of the high number of late bowel complications after 32P treatment, it was recommended that cisplatin be used as standard adjuvant treatment for subsequent controlled studies.