P

Philip D. Ross

Wayne State University

Publishes on Bone health and osteoporosis research, Hip and Femur Fractures, Bone health and treatments. 276 papers and 26.7k citations.

276Publications
26.7kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Thermodynamics of protein association reactions: forces contributing to stability
Cited by 5.5k

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTThermodynamics of protein association reactions: forces contributing to stabilityPhilip D. Ross and S. SubramanianCite this: Biochemistry 1981, 20, 11, 3096–3102Publication Date (Print):May 1, 1981Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 May 1981https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/bi00514a017https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00514a017research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views8439Altmetric-Citations4552LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts

Patients with Prior Fractures Have an Increased Risk of Future Fractures: A Summary of the Literature and Statistical Synthesis
Carolyn M. Klotzbuecher, Philip D. Ross, Pamela B. Landsman et al.|Journal of Bone and Mineral Research|2000
Cited by 2k

Numerous studies have reported increased risks of hip, spine, and other fractures among people who had previous clinically diagnosed fractures, or who have radiographic evidence of vertebral fractures. However, there is some variability in the magnitudes of associations among studies. We summarized the literature and performed a statistical synthesis of the risk of future fracture, given a history of prior fracture. The strongest associations were observed between prior and subsequent vertebral fractures; women with preexisting vertebral fractures (identified at baseline by vertebral morphometry) had approximately 4 times greater risk of subsequent vertebral fractures than those without prior fractures. This risk increases with the number of prior vertebral fractures. Most studies reported relative risks of approximately 2 for other combinations of prior and future fracture sites (hip, spine, wrist, or any site). The confidence profile method was used to derive a single pooled estimate from the studies that provided sufficient data for other combinations of prior and subsequent fracture sites. Studies of peri- and postmenopausal women with prior fractures had 2.0 (95 % CI = 1.8, 2.1) times the risk of subsequent fracture compared with women without prior fractures. For other studies (including men and women of all ages), the risk was increased by 2.2 (1.9, 2.6) times. We conclude that history of prior fracture at any site is an important risk factor for future fractures. Patients with a history of prior fracture, therefore, should receive further evaluation for osteoporosis and fracture risk.

Pre-Existing Fractures and Bone Mass Predict Vertebral Fracture Incidence in Women
Philip D. Ross, James W. Davis, Robert S. Epstein et al.|Annals of Internal Medicine|1991
Cited by 1.1k

OBJECTIVE: To determine the independent contributions of bone mass and existing fractures as predictors of the risk for new vertebral fractures. SUBJECTS: Postmenopausal Japanese-American women. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline measurements of the distal radius, the proximal radius, and the calcaneus were obtained in 1981 using single-photon absorptiometry. Measurements of the lumbar spine were obtained in 1984 using dual-photon absorptiometry. Prevalent vertebral fractures were identified using dimensions measured on lateral radiographs; vertebral height values more than 3 SD below vertebra-specific means were considered to indicate fracture. Statistical models were used to evaluate the utility of bone mass and existing (prevalent) fractures to predict the risk for new fractures during an average follow-up of 4.7 years. MAIN RESULTS: Differences of 2 SD in bone mass were associated with fourfold to sixfold increases in the risk for new vertebral fractures. A single fracture at the baseline examination increased the risk for new vertebral fractures fivefold. Presence of two or more fractures at baseline increased the risk 12-fold. A combination of low bone mass (below the 33d percentile) and the presence of two or more prevalent fractures increased the risk 75-fold, relative to women with the highest bone mass (above the 67th percentile) and no prevalent fractures. Stature, body mass index, arm span, and spinal conditions such as scoliosis, osteoarthritis, and sacroiliitis did not predict fracture incidence (P greater than 0.05). Weight was marginally predictive (P = 0.04) of fracture incidence but became nonpredictive after adjusting for bone mass (P greater than or equal to 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both bone mass and prevalent vertebral fractures are powerful predictors of the risk for new vertebral fractures. Combining information about bone mass and prevalent fracture appears to be better for predicting new fractures than either variable alone. Physicians can use these risk factors to identify patients at greatest risk for new fractures.

Intermittent Cyclical Etidronate Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Nelson B. Watts, Steven T. Harris, Harry K. Genant et al.|New England Journal of Medicine|1990
Cited by 957

BACKGROUND: To determine the effects of etidronate (a bisphosphonate that inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption) in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, we conducted a prospective, two-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in 429 women who had one to four vertebral compression fractures plus radiographic evidence of osteopenia. METHODS: The patients were randomly assigned to treatment with phosphate (1.0 g) or placebo twice daily on days 1 through 3, etidronate (400 mg) or placebo daily on days 4 through 17, and supplemental calcium (500 mg) daily on days 18 through 91 (group 1, placebo and placebo; group 2, phosphate and placebo; group 3, placebo and etidronate; and group 4, phosphate and etidronate). The treatment cycles were repeated eight times. The bone density of the spine was measured by dual-photon absorptiometry, and the rates of new vertebral fractures were determined from sequential radiographs. RESULTS: After two years, the patients receiving etidronate (groups 3 and 4) had significant increases in their mean (+/- SE) spinal bone density (4.2 +/- 0.8 percent and 5.2 +/- 0.7 percent, respectively; P less than 0.017). The rate of new vertebral fractures was reduced by half in the etidronate-treated patients (groups 3 and 4 combined) as compared with the patients who did not receive etidronate (groups 1 and 2 combined) (29.5 vs. 62.9 fractures per 1000 patient-years; P = 0.043); the effect of treatment was most striking in the subgroup of patients with the lowest spinal bone mineral density at base line, in whom fracture rates were reduced by two thirds (42.3 vs. 132.7 fractures per 1000 patient-years; P = 0.004). The addition of phosphate provided no apparent benefit. There were no significant adverse effects of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent cyclical therapy with etidronate for two years significantly increases spinal bone mass and reduces the incidence of new vertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Kinetics and Mechanism of Deoxyhemoglobin S Gelation: A New Approach to Understanding Sickle Cell Disease
James Hofrichter, Philip D. Ross, William A. Eaton|Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|1974
Cited by 508Open Access

We report the results of a kinetic investigation on the gelation of purified deoxyhemoglobin S. Gelation was induced by raising the temperature and was monitored by measuring both the heat absorbed, with a microcalorimeter, and the appearance of linear birefringence, with a microspectrophotometer. The kinetics are unusual. Prior to the onset of gelation there is a delay period, followed by a sigmoidal progress curve. The delay time is formally dependent on approximately the 30th power of the deoxyhemoglobin S concentration; a decrease in concentration from 23 to 22 g/dl increases the delay time by a factor of four. It is also extremely temperature dependent; a 1 degrees C temperature rise in the range 20-30 degrees C almost halves the delay time. From these results we conclude that the initial rate is controlled by the nucleation of individual fibers. We present a kinetic model that accounts for the concentration, temperature, and time dependence of the initial phase of the gelation reaction. Extrapolation of our data to physiological conditions predicts that changes in intracellular hemoglobin concentration and oxygen saturation, realizable in vivo, produce enormous changes in the delay time. The range of delay times spans both the mean capillary transit and total circulation times. This result points to the delay time as an extremely important variable in determining the course of sickle cell disease, and suggests a new approach to therapy.