Evidence for an Excess of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math>DecaysJ. P. Lees, V. Poireau, V. Tisserand et al.|Physical Review Letters|2012 Based on the full BABAR data sample, we report improved measurements of the ratios $\mathcal{R}({D}^{(*)})=\mathcal{B}(\overline{B}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{D}^{(*)}{\ensuremath{\tau}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}})/\mathcal{B}(\overline{B}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{D}^{(*)}{\ensuremath{\ell}}_{\ensuremath{\ell}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{\ensuremath{\ell}})$, where $\ensuremath{\ell}$ is either $e$ or $\ensuremath{\mu}$. These ratios are sensitive to new physics contributions in the form of a charged Higgs boson. We measure $\mathcal{R}(D)=0.440\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.058\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.042$ and $\mathcal{R}({D}^{*})=0.332\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.024\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.018$, which exceed the standard model expectations by $2.0\ensuremath{\sigma}$ and $2.7\ensuremath{\sigma}$, respectively. Taken together, our results disagree with these expectations at the $3.4\ensuremath{\sigma}$ level. This excess cannot be explained by a charged Higgs boson in the type II two-Higgs-doublet model.
Measurement of an excess of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold" stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="bold" stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">−</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math>decays and implications for charged Higgs bosonsJ. P. Lees, V. Poireau, V. Tisserand et al.|Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology|2013 Based on the full BABAR data sample, we report improved measurements of the ratios $\mathcal{R}(D)=\mathcal{B}(\overline{B}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}D{\ensuremath{\tau}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}})/\mathcal{B}(\overline{B}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}D{\ensuremath{\ell}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{\ensuremath{\ell}})$ and $\mathcal{R}({D}^{*})=\mathcal{B}(\overline{B}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{D}^{*}{\ensuremath{\tau}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}})/\mathcal{B}(\overline{B}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{D}^{*}{\ensuremath{\ell}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{\ensuremath{\ell}})$, where $\ensuremath{\ell}$ refers to either an electron or muon. These ratios are sensitive to new physics contributions in the form of a charged Higgs boson. We measure $\mathcal{R}(D)=0.440\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.058\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.042$ and $\mathcal{R}({D}^{*})=0.332\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.024\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.018$, which exceed the standard model expectations by $2.0\ensuremath{\sigma}$ and $2.7\ensuremath{\sigma}$, respectively. Taken together, the results disagree with these expectations at the $3.4\ensuremath{\sigma}$ level. This excess cannot be explained by a charged Higgs boson in the type II two-Higgs-doublet model. Kinematic distributions presented here exclude large portions of the more general type III two-Higgs-doublet model, but there are solutions within this model compatible with the results.
Precise measurement of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">−</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">−</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo mathvariant="bold" stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold" stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>cross section with the initial-state radiation method at<i>BABAR</i>J. P. Lees, V. Poireau, V. Tisserand et al.|Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology|2012 A precise measurement of the cross section of the process e^+e^-→π^+π^-(γ) from threshold to an energy of 3 GeV is obtained with the initial-state radiation (ISR) method using 232 fb^(-1) of data collected with the BABAR detector at e^+e^- center-of-mass energies near 10.6 GeV. The ISR luminosity is determined from a study of the leptonic process e^+e^-→μ^+μ^-(γ)γ_(ISR), which is found to agree with the next-to-leading-order QED prediction to within 1.1%. The cross section for the process e^+e^-→π^+π^-(γ) is obtained with a systematic uncertainty of 0.5% in the dominant ρ resonance region. The leading-order hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic anomaly calculated using the measured ππ cross section from threshold to 1.8 GeV is (514.1±2.2(stat)±3.1(syst))×10^(-10).
Measurement of branching fractions and rate asymmetries in the rare decays<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math>J. P. Lees, V. Poireau, V. Tisserand et al.|Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology|2012 In a sample of 471×106 BB̅ events collected with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II e+e- collider we study the rare decays B→K(*)l+l-, where l+l- is either e+e- or μ+μ-. We report results on partial branching fractions and isospin asymmetries in seven bins of dilepton mass-squared. We further present CP and lepton-flavor asymmetries for dilepton masses below and above the J/ψ resonance. We find no evidence for CP or lepton-flavor violation. The partial branching fractions and isospin asymmetries are consistent with the Standard Model predictions and with results from other experiments.
Search for<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold" stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="bold" stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math>and invisible quarkonium decaysJ. P. Lees, V. Poireau, V. Tisserand et al.|Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology|2013 We search for the flavor-changing neutral-current decays $B\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{(*)}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$, and the invisible decays $J/\ensuremath{\psi}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ and $\ensuremath{\psi}(2S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ via $B\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{(*)}J/\ensuremath{\psi}$ and $B\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{(*)}\ensuremath{\psi}(2S)$, respectively, using a data sample of $471\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{6}$ $B\overline{B}$ pairs collected by the BABAR experiment. We fully reconstruct the hadronic decay of one of the $B$ mesons in the $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(4S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}B\overline{B}$ decay, and search for the $B\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{(*)}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ decay in the rest of the event. We observe no significant excess of signal decays over background and report branching fraction upper limits of $\mathcal{B}({B}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{+}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}})<3.7\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$, $\mathcal{B}({B}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{0}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}})<8.1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$, $\mathcal{B}({B}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{*+}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}})<11.6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$, $\mathcal{B}({B}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{*0}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}})<9.3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$, and combined upper limits of $\mathcal{B}(B\ensuremath{\rightarrow}K\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}})<3.2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$ and $\mathcal{B}(B\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{*}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}})<7.9\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$, all at the 90% confidence level. For the invisible quarkonium decays, we report branching fraction upper limits of $\mathcal{B}(J/\ensuremath{\psi}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}})<3.9\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$ and $\mathcal{B}(\ensuremath{\psi}(2S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}})<15.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$ at the 90% confidence level. Using the improved kinematic resolution achieved from hadronic reconstruction, we also provide partial branching fraction limits for the $B\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{(*)}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ decays over the full kinematic spectrum.