Fédérica Dondero

This multicentric study of 17 high-volume centers presents 12 benchmark values for liver transplantation. Those values, mostly targeting markers of morbidity, were gathered from 2024 “low risk” cases, and may serve as reference to assess outcome of single or any groups of patients. Objective: To propose benchmark outcome values in liver transplantation, serving as reference for assessing individual patients or any other patient groups. Background: Best achievable results in liver transplantation, that is, benchmarks, are unknown. Consequently, outcome comparisons within or across centers over time remain speculative. Methods: Out of 7492 liver transplantation performed in 17 international centers from 3 continents, we identified 2024 low risk adult cases with a laboratory model for end-stage liver disease score ≤20 points, a balance of risk score ≤9, and receiving a primary graft by donation after brain death. We chose clinically relevant endpoints covering intra- and postoperative course, with a focus on complications graded by severity including the complication comprehensive index (CCI®). Respective benchmarks were derived from the median value in each center, and the 75 percentile was considered the benchmark cutoff. Results: Benchmark cases represented 8% to 49% of cases per center. One-year patient-survival was 91.6% with 3.5% retransplantations. Eighty-two percent of patients developed at least 1 complication during 1-year follow-up. Biliary complications occurred in one-fifth of the patients up to 6 months after surgery. Benchmark cutoffs were ≤4 days for ICU stay, ≤18 days for hospital stay, ≤59% for patients with severe complications (≥ Grade III) and ≤42.1 for 1-year CCI®. Comparisons with the next higher risk group (model for end stage liver disease 21–30) disclosed an increase in morbidity but within benchmark cutoffs for most, but not all indicators, while in patients receiving a second graft from 1 center (n = 50) outcome values were all outside of benchmark values. Conclusions: Despite excellent 1-year survival, morbidity in benchmark cases remains high with half of patients developing severe complications during 1-year follow-up. Benchmark cutoffs targeting morbidity parameters offer a valid tool to assess higher risk groups.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgical liver resection has been demonstrated in Asian countries to be the best therapeutic option in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Because the value of this treatment is still debated in Western countries, the aim of this paper was to report a European experience of resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: From 1990 to 1999, 239 men and 61 women aged from 15 to 77 years old underwent 328 resections including major resection in 138 (42%) cases. Normal liver was present in 53 patients (17%) and chronic liver disease was present in 247 including 152 (50%) with cirrhosis. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 6.4% and was significantly influenced by the presence of chronic liver disease (1.7% vs. 7.4%). Mortality after resection in alcoholic patients (14%), in patients with hepatitis C (9%) was significantly higher than in patients chronic hepatitis B (1%) (P < 0.05). The overall survival rates were 81%, 57%, 37%, and 13% at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years. Five-year survival rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in patients with normal liver as compared to chronic liver disease (50% vs. 34%). In patients with chronic liver disease parameters, which significantly influenced survival rate, were vascular invasion, tumor differentiation and the extent of resection. CONCLUSIONS: In this European study with varied profile of etiologies associated with hepatocellular carcinoma we showed that a five-year survival rate of 40% can be expected after resection and that chronic liver disease is a major factor influencing short and long-term prognosis.

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of mortality in liver transplant recipients. The incidence, microbiology, and outcome of BSIs in the first year after liver transplantation were analyzed in 704 patients who underwent transplantation at a single center between 1997 and 2007. BSIs occurred in 205 (29.1%) of the 704 patients. Overall, 259 episodes were documented, and they resulted in an incidence rate of 36.8%. Of these episodes, 39.4%, 27.8%, 17%, and 15.8% occurred in the very early period (< or = 10 days after liver transplantation), the early period (days 11-30), the intermediate period (days 31-90), and the late period (days 91-365), respectively. The most frequent pathogens were Enterobacteriaceae members (41%), Staphylococcus aureus (19.8%), enterococci (13.1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.8%), and yeasts (7.1%). The median time of onset ranged from 7 days for methicillin-resistant S. aureus to 25 days for Enterobacteriaceae. Mortality at 15 days after BSIs was 16.2%. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients with BSIs had a significantly higher 1-year mortality rate than those without BSIs (28.3% versus 16.6%, P < 0.001 with the log-rank test). When the time of BSI onset was considered, 1-year mortality was significantly associated with very early and early episodes (P < 0.001) but not with intermediate and late episodes (P = 0.47). In conclusion, BSIs are frequent and early complications after liver transplantation and are mostly caused by gram-negative bacilli. A BSI in the first posttransplant month is a significant predictor of 1-year survival.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates (ESBLE) are emerging pathogens that confer resistance to antimicrobial drugs. We conducted a 10-year study in France (January 2001-April 2010) to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for ESBLE infections after liver transplant. Of 710 transplant patients screened preoperatively for ESBLE fecal carriage, 5.5% had ESBLE infection develop within 4 months after surgery; patients with pretransplant ESBLE fecal carriage were more likely to have infection develop than were noncarriers. Typing showed extensive genetic diversity, with a large predominance of CTX-M enzymes. Independent predictors of ESBLE infection were pretransplant fecal carriage, Model for End Stage Liver Disease score >25, and return to surgery. Our results indicate that the influx of preoperatively acquired ESBLE isolates into the hospital outweighs cross-transmission in the epidemiology of ESBLE infections after liver transplant. Transplant candidates should be systematically screened for carriage, and posttransplant infection in carriers should be treated with carbapenems.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) was initiated in France in 2015 under a protocol based on the use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) before organ procurement. The aim was to compare outcomes following cDCD LT with NRP and donation after brain death (DBD) LT. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study comparing cDCD LT with NRP and DBD LT. A case-matched study (1:2) was performed using the variables such as recipient and donor age, indication of LT. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients from the cDCD group were matched to 100 patients from the DBD group. From postoperative days 1-4, serum transaminase release was significantly lower in the cDCD group compared to the DBD group (P < 0.05). Early allograft dysfunction (cDCD: 18% versus DBD: 32%; P = 0.11), acute kidney injury (26% versus 33%; P = 0.49), 90-d graft loss (2% versus 5%; P = 0.66), and arterial (4% versus 12%; P = 0.19) and biliary (16% versus 17%; P = 0.94) complications were similar between the 2 groups. The 2-y graft survival was 88% for cDCD group and 85% for DBD group (P = 0.91). The 2-y patient survival was 90% for cDCD group and 88% for DBD group (P = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that cDCD LT following postmortem NRP can be safely and effectively performed in selected recipients with similar graft and patient survival outcomes, without increased rates of biliary complications and early graft dysfunction compared to DBD LT.