Rebecca Jackson

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization (IVF) are at higher risk of perinatal mortality, preterm delivery, small for gestational age, and low or very low birth weight compared with spontaneous conceptions in studies that adjusted for age and parity. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, BIOSIS, Doctoral Dissertations On-Line, bibliographies, and conference proceedings for studies from 1978-2002 using the terms "in vitro fertilization," "female infertility therapy," and "reproductive techniques" combined with "fetal death," "mortality," "fetal growth restriction," "small for gestational age," "birth weight," "premature labor," "pre-term delivery," "infant," "obstetric," "perinatal," and "neonatal." METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies following IVF compared with spontaneous conceptions, control for maternal age and parity; 1 of the above outcomes; and risk ratios or data to determine them. Study selection and data abstraction were performed in duplicate after removing identifying information. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprising 12,283 IVF and 1.9 million spontaneously conceived singletons were identified. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Compared with spontaneous conceptions, IVF singleton pregnancies were associated with significantly higher odds of each of the perinatal outcomes examined: perinatal mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 3.0), preterm delivery (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.7, 2.2), low birth weight (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4, 2.2), very low birth weight (OR 2.7; 95% CI 2.3, 3.1), and small for gestational age (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3, 2.0). Statistical heterogeneity was noted only for preterm delivery and low birth weight. Sensitivity analyses revealed no significant changes in results. Early preterm delivery, spontaneous preterm delivery, placenta previa, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and neonatal intensive care admission were also significantly more prevalent in the IVF group. CONCLUSION: In vitro fertilization patients should be advised of the increased risk for adverse perinatal outcomes. Obstetricians should not only manage these pregnancies as high risk but also avoid iatrogenic harm caused by elective preterm labor induction or cesarean.

OBJECTIVES: How do health care professionals assess the care of hospital patients near the end of life? Are physicians and nurses aware of and in agreement with national recommendations regarding patients' rights to forgo life-sustaining medical treatments and to receive adequate pain control? METHODS: We surveyed 687 physicians and 759 nurses in 5 hospitals. RESULTS: Almost half (47%) of all respondents and fully 70% of the house officers reported that they had acted against their conscience in providing care to the terminally ill. Four times as many respondents were concerned about the provision of overly burdensome treatment than about undertreatment. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, many physicians and nurses were disturbed by the degree to which technological solutions influence care during the final days of a terminal illness and by the undertreatment of pain. However, changes in the care of dying patients may not have kept pace with national recommendations, in part because many physicians and nurses disagreed with and may have been unaware of some key guidelines, such as the permissibility of withdrawing treatments.