Suneel Gupta

The low and variable bioavailability of cyclosporine has been attributed to poor absorption. However, recent studies have suggested that intestinal first-pass metabolism exerts a significant effect on bioavailability. We describe theory and methods to differentiate the contribution from oral absorption and intestinal and hepatic metabolism to overall cyclosporine bioavailability. Analysis of data from previous studies in our laboratories shows that in the absence of intestinal metabolism, cyclosporine absorption from its presently available dosage form averages at least 65% +/- 12% in healthy volunteers and 77% +/- 19% in kidney transplant patients. Analysis also suggests that the extraction ratio for cyclosporine in the gut is approximately twice the hepatic extraction and that cyclosporine absorption does not present a problem, with an average of 86% of the drug absorbed intact from its commercially available product in healthy volunteers. The boundary condition analysis described should have broad application in the differentiation of factors responsible for poor bioavailability.

BACKGROUND: The duration of action of the immediate-release formulation of methylphenidate hydrochloride is short (3 to 4 hours), and 3 times daily dosing is thought to maximize effectiveness across a 12-hour day. The initial sustained-release formulations of methylphenidate had reduced efficacy compared with immediate-release methylphenidate and were not well accepted. Tachyphylaxis was hypothesized to account for the reduced effects, and an ascending drug delivery pattern was proposed to overcome this acute tolerance. METHODS: Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were evaluated in a laboratory school to characterize onset and duration of the effect of a variety of methylphenidate regimens. In a proof-of-concept study, an experimental ascending profile was established by an initial bolus followed by small increasing doses of immediate-release methylphenidate in capsules administered every 30 minutes for 8 hours. Two proof-of-product studies of a new oral once-a-day formulation to deliver methylphenidate by an osmotic pump process based on OROS (ALZA Corp, Mountain View, Calif) technology (hereafter referred to "OROS-methylphenidate") were conducted: a pharmacokinetic study and a pharmacodynamic study. RESULTS: The experimental ascending profile matched the effect of the standard regimen of methylphenidate, 3 times daily. In the pharmacokinetic study, OROS-methylphenidate treatment produced a rapid rise followed by increasing plasma concentrations that peaked 7 to 9 hours after administration. In the pharmacodynamic study, OROS-methylphenidate treatment matched the 3 times daily dosing of methylphenidate for onset and duration of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate the translation of a basic science finding (acute tolerance to clinical doses of methylphenidate) into clinical application (the selection of a new drug delivery pattern for methylphenidate). This approach produced a new product (OROS-methylphenidate or Concerta), which proved to have the predicted rapid onset (with 1-2 hours) and long duration of efficacy (10-12 hours) after a single administration in the morning.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of several drug delivery patterns of methylphenidate and to determine whether acute tolerance develops to this widely used stimulant medication in the treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. METHODS: Double-blind trials were conducted in a laboratory school setting in which multiple measures of efficacy were obtained frequently in the morning and afternoon across the school day. In study I, relative efficacy was determined for three dosing patterns of methylphenidate: a standard twice-daily profile, a flat profile, and an ascending profile. In study II, tolerance was assessed by comparison of three-times-a-day regimens in which the time of the middle dose varied. RESULTS: In study I, the efficacy of the ascending treatment increased across the day, and in the afternoon it was equal to the efficacy of the twice-daily treatment, indicating that an initial bolus was not required for efficacy. The efficacy of the flat treatment declined across the day, and in the afternoon it was significantly less than in the twice-daily treatment, suggesting that tolerance may be developing. In study II, acute improvements in efficacy were reduced to the second of two closely spaced but not to two widely spaced bolus doses, suggesting that shortly after exposure to high concentrations, efficacy is reduced to given concentrations of methylphenidate. In a concentration-effect model, a tolerance term was needed to account for counterclockwise hysteresis. CONCLUSIONS: Acute tolerance to methylphenidate appears to exist. This should be considered in the design of an optimal dosing regimen for the treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

BACKGROUND: The osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system, OROS, is an advanced drug delivery technology that uses osmotic pressure as the driving force to deliver pharmacotherapy, usually once-daily, in several therapeutic areas. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to discuss the evolution of OROS technology and examine the many therapeutic areas where OROS products are being used. METHODS: A search of Medline and EMBASE were performed using the keywords 'OROS' and 'osmotic delivery' for the period January 1990 to June 2005. Data were also obtained from the manufacturers' websites and associated publications. RESULTS: OROS technology has evolved over the last 30 years, resulting in four systems: the elementary osmotic pump; the two-layer osmotic push-pull tablet; the advanced longitudinally compressed tablet multilayer formulation; and, the L-OROS system. OROS technology is employed for drug delivery in many therapeutic areas including: cardiovascular medicine, endocrinology, urology, and central nervous system (CNS) therapeutics. Two calcium channel blockers utilizing OROS technology for the treatment of hypertension are nifedipine and verapamil. Glipizide extended-release is used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Doxazosin is used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and oxybutynin for overactive bladder. Most recent developments are with drugs that affect the CNS, including the use of methylphenidate for treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, paliperidone extended-release and OROS hydromorphone, which are under clinical development for schizophrenia and chronic pain, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Drug delivery using the various OROS products can result in an improved safety profile, stable drug concentrations, uniform drug effects, and reduced dosing frequency. OROS technology has also enabled the use of an effective starting dose, without the need for dose titration, which allows the achievement of symptom control much earlier than that observed with immediate-release preparations. Such attributes can enhance patient compliance and convenience, thereby ensuring efficacy and improving patient outcomes.