Christian Müller

RATIONALE: In patients with community-acquired pneumonia, guidelines recommend antibiotic treatment for 7 to 21 d. Procalcitonin is elevated in bacterial infections, and its dynamics have prognostic implications. OBJECTIVE: To assess procalcitonin guidance for the initiation and duration of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: In a randomized intervention trial, 302 consecutive patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia were included. Data were assessed at baseline, after 4, 6, and 8 d, and after 6 wk. The control group (n = 151) received antibiotics according to usual practice. In the procalcitonin group (n = 151), antibiotic treatment was based on serum procalcitonin concentrations as follows: strongly discouraged, less than 0.1 microg/L; discouraged, less than 0.25 microg/L; encouraged, greater than 0.25 microg/L; strongly encouraged, greater than 0.5 microg/L. The primary endpoint was antibiotic use; secondary endpoints were measures of clinical, laboratory, and radiographic outcome. RESULTS: At baseline, both groups were similar regarding clinical, laboratory, and microbiology characteristics, and Pneumonia Severity Index. Procalcitonin guidance reduced total antibiotic exposure (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.55; p < 0.001), antibiotic prescriptions on admission (85 vs. 99%; p < 0.001), and antibiotic treatment duration (median, 5 vs. 12 d; p < 0.001) compared with patients treated according to guidelines. After adjustment for Pneumonia Severity Index, the hazard ratio of antibiotic discontinuation was higher in the procalcitonin group than in the control group (3.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.5 to 4.2). Outcome was similar in both groups, with an overall success rate of 83%. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin guidance substantially reduces antibiotic use in community-acquired pneumonia. These findings may have important clinical and public health implications.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of an effective antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticlopidine after the placement of coronary-artery stents has decreased the risk of thrombotic stent occlusions (TSO) and hemorrhagic complications. However, the use of ticlopidine is limited by hematological and gastrointestinal adverse effects. The safety and efficacy of clopidogrel after stenting remains to be established. METHODS AND RESULTS: After successful coronary stenting during elective or emergency percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 700 patients with 899 lesions were randomly assigned to receive a 4-week course of either 500 mg ticlopidine (n=345) or 75 mg clopidogrel (n=355), in addition to 100 mg aspirin. All the following clinical events reflecting TSO were included in the prespecified primary cardiac endpoint: cardiac death, urgent target vessel revascularization, angiographically documented TSO, or nonfatal myocardial infarction within 30 days. The primary noncardiac endpoint was defined as noncardiac death, stroke, severe peripheral vascular or hemorrhagic events, or any adverse event resulting in discontinuation of study medication. Cardiac events occurred in 17 patients [11 (3.1%) with clopidogrel and 6 (1.7%) with ticlopidine (P=0.24)]. The primary noncardiac endpoint was observed in 16 patients (4.5%) assigned to receive clopidogrel versus 33 patients (9.6%) assigned to receive ticlopidine (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: After the placement of coronary-artery stents in unselected patients, antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel seems to be comparably safe and effective as aspirin and ticlopidine. Noncardiac events were significantly reduced with clopidogrel.