Yichen Xu

Recent years have seen a growing interest in Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL), which trains Graph Neural Network (GNN) model to discriminate similar and dissimilar pairs of nodes without human annotations. Most prior GCL work focuses on homogeneous graphs and little attention has been paid to Heterogeneous Graphs (HGs) that involve different types of nodes and edges. Moreover, earlier studies reveal that the explicit use of structure information of underlying graphs is useful for learning representations. Conventional GCL methods merely measure the likelihood of contrastive pairs according to node representations, which may not align with the true semantic similarities. How to leverage such structure information for GCL is not yet well-understood. To address the aforementioned challenges, this paper presents a novel method dubbed STructure-EnhaNced heterogeneous graph ContrastIve Learning, STENCIL for brevity. At first, we generate multiple semantic views for HGs based on metapaths. Unlike most methods that maximize the consistency among these views, we propose a novel multiview contrastive aggregation objective to adaptively distill information from each view. In addition, we advocate the explicit use of structure embedding, which enriches the model with local structural patterns of the underlying HGs, so as to better mine true and hard negatives for GCL. Empirical studies on three real-world datasets show that our proposed method consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods and even surpasses several supervised counterparts.

Graphs are ubiquitous in encoding relational information of real-world objects in many domains. Graph generation, whose purpose is to generate new graphs from a distribution similar to the observed graphs, has received increasing attention thanks to the recent advances of deep learning models. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive review on the existing literature of deep graph generation from a variety of emerging methods to its wide application areas. Specifically, we first formulate the problem of deep graph generation and discuss its difference with several related graph learning tasks. Secondly, we divide the state-of-the-art methods into three categories based on model architectures and summarize their generation strategies. Thirdly, we introduce three key application areas of deep graph generation. Lastly, we highlight challenges and opportunities in the future study of deep graph generation. We hope that our survey will be useful for researchers and practitioners who are interested in this exciting and rapidly-developing field.