Hematology Oncology Consultants
Publishes on Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications, Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics. 29 papers and 6.8k citations.
Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.
Adenosine kinase catalyzes the phosphorylation of adenosine to AMP and hence is a potentially important regulator of extracellular adenosine concentrations. Despite extensive characterization of the kinetic properties of the enzyme, its primary structure has never been elucidated. Full-length cDNA clones encoding catalytically active adenosine kinase were obtained from lymphocyte, placental, and liver cDNA libraries. Corresponding mRNA species of 1.3 and 1.8 kb were noted on Northern blots of all tissues examined and were attributable to alternative polyadenylylation sites at the 3' end of the gene. The encoding protein consists of 345 amino acids with a calculated molecular size of 38.7 kDa and does not contain any sequence similarities to other well-characterized mammalian nucleoside kinases, setting it apart from this family of structurally and functionally related proteins. In contrast, two regions were identified with significant sequence identity to microbial ribokinase and fructokinases and a bacterial inosine/guanosine kinase. Thus, adenosine kinase is a structurally distinct mammalian nucleoside kinase that appears to be akin to sugar kinases of microbial origin.
Deoxycytidine kinase (NTP:deoxycytidine 5'-phosphotransferase, EC 2.7.1.74) is an enzyme that catalyzes phosphorylation of deoxyribonucleosides and a number of nucleoside analogs that are important in antiviral and cancer chemotherapy. Deficiency of this enzyme activity is associated with resistance to these agents, whereas increased enzyme activity is associated with increased activation of such compounds to cytotoxic nucleoside triphosphate derivatives. To characterize the regulation of expression of this gene, we have isolated genomic clones encompassing its entire coding and 5' flanking regions and delineated all the exon/intron boundaries. The gene extends over more than 34 kilobases on chromosome 4 and the coding region is composed of 7 exons ranging in size from 90 to 1544 base pairs (bp). The 5' flanking region is highly G+C-rich and contains four regions that are potential Sp1 binding sites. A 697-bp fragment encompassing 386 bp of 5' upstream region, the 250-bp first exon, and 61 bp of the first intron was demonstrated to promote chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity in a T-lymphoblast cell line and to have > 6-fold greater activity in a Jurkat T-lymphoblast than in a Raji B-lymphoblast cell line. Our data suggest that these 5' sequences may contain elements that are important for the tissue-specific differences in deoxycytidine kinase expression.
BACKGROUND: For patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, there are no approved or established treatments beyond the 2nd line. A Phase Ib study of fractionated radioimmunotherapy was undertaken in this setting, administering (90)Y-clivatuzumab tetraxetan (yttrium-90-radiolabelled humanised antibody targeting pancreatic adenocarcinoma mucin) with or without low radiosensitising doses of gemcitabine. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with three (2-7) median prior treatments were treated on Arm A (N=29, (90)Y-clivatuzumab tetraxetan, weekly 6.5 mCi/m(2)doses×3, plus gemcitabine, weekly 200 mg/m(2) doses×4 starting 1 week earlier) or Arm B (N=29, (90)Y-clivatuzumab tetraxetan alone, weekly 6.5 mCi/m(2)doses×3), repeating cycles after 4-week delays. Safety was the primary endpoint; efficacy was also evaluated. RESULTS: Cytopaenias (predominantly transient thrombocytopenia) were the only significant toxicities. Fifty-three patients (27 Arm A, 26 Arm B, 91% overall) completed ⩾1 full treatment cycles, with 23 (12 Arm A, 11 Arm B; 40%) receiving multiple cycles, including seven (6 Arm A, 1 Arm B; 12%) given 3-9 cycles. Two patients in Arm A had partial responses by RECIST criteria. Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) appeared improved in Arm A versus B (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% CI: 0.29-0.86; P=0.017, log-rank) and the median OS for Arm A versus Arm B increased to 7.9 versus 3.4 months with multiple cycles (HR 0.32, P=0.004), including three patients in Arm A surviving >1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical studies of (90)Y-clivatuzumab tetraxetan combined with low-dose gemcitabine appear feasible in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients beyond 2nd line and a Phase III trial of this combination is now underway in this setting.
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is a next-generation sequencing-based methodology that detects 4 classes of genomic alterations, as well as gene signature biomarkers such as microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden. In the context of precision oncology, CGP can help to direct treatment to genomically matched therapies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of a 3-year observational analysis of patients undergoing testing with CGP assays (either FoundationOne or FoundationOne Heme) at a community oncology practice after a regional health plan implemented a medical policy that enabled coverage of CGP. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records was completed at the oncology practice from November 2013 to January 2017; this date range was chosen to coincide with the regional health plan’s medical policy implementation of CGP. The medical policy provided coverage of CGP for patients with advanced solid and hematologic cancers. A medical record review assessed all previous and current molecular test results, matched therapy or clinical trial enrollment, and clinical outcomes (clinical benefit or disease progression). The potential cost diversion, from payer to study sponsor, for patients who enrolled in clinical trials was explored. RESULTS: There were 96 patients in the community oncology practice who received CGP over the 3-year period, 86 of whom had clinically relevant genomic alterations. Of the 86, 15 patients were treated with genomically matched therapy, and 6 patients enrolled in clinical trials based on CGP results. In a subset of 32 patients who previously underwent conventional testing, most (84%) had clinically relevant genomic alterations detected by CGP that conventional testing did not identify, and a portion of these patients subsequently received treatment based on the CGP results. In the separate cost diversion analysis of 20 patients who enrolled in phase 1 clinical trials, an estimated $25,000 per-patient cost-benefit may have been accrued to the payer. CONCLUSIONS: This observational analysis characterized the use of CGP in a large community oncology practice among a group of patients insured by a regional health plan. Clinical trial enrollment was facilitated by CGP use in the community setting and may have contributed to cost diversion from the payer to study sponsors. DISCLOSURES: No separate study-related funding was provided by or to Priority Health, Foundation Medicine, and Cancer and Hematology Centers of West Michigan. Data analysis by Reitsma was conducted as part of an internship funded by Priority Health. Reitsma and Fox are employed by Priority Health. Anhorn, Vanden Borre, Cavanaugh, Chudnovsky, and Erlich are employed by Foundation Medicine.