Laura Carrel

X inactivation is a chromosome-specific form of genetic regulation in which thousands of genes on one homologue become silenced early in female embryogenesis. Although many aspects of X inactivation are now understood, the spread of the X inactivation signal along the entire length of the chromosome remains enigmatic. Extending the Gartler-Riggs model [Gartler, S. M. & Riggs, A. D. (1983) Annu. Rev. Genet. 17, 155-190], Lyon recently proposed [Lyon, M. F. (1998) Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 80, 133-137] that a nonrandom organization of long interspersed element (LINE) repetitive sequences on the X chromosome might be responsible for its facultative heterochromatization. In this paper, we present data indicating that the LINE-1 (L1) composition of the human X chromosome is fundamentally distinct from that of human autosomes. The X chromosome is enriched 2-fold for L1 repetitive elements, with the greatest enrichment observed for a restricted subset of LINE-1 elements that were active <100 million years ago. Regional analysis of the X chromosome reveals that the most significant clustering of these elements is in Xq13-Xq21 (the center of X inactivation). Genomic segments harboring genes that escape inactivation are significantly reduced in L1 content compared with X chromosome segments containing genes subject to X inactivation, providing further support for the association between X inactivation and L1 content. These nonrandom properties of L1 distribution on the X chromosome provide strong evidence that L1 elements may serve as DNA signals to propagate X inactivation along the chromosome.

In females, most genes on the X chromosome are generally assumed to be transcriptionally silenced on the inactive X as a result of X inactivation. However, particularly in humans, an increasing number of genes are known to "escape" X inactivation and are expressed from both the active (Xa) and inactive (Xi) X chromosomes; such genes reflect different molecular and epigenetic responses to X inactivation and are candidates for phenotypes associated with X aneuploidy. To identify genes that escape X inactivation and to generate a first-generation X-inactivation profile of the X, we have evaluated the expression of 224 X-linked genes and expressed sequence tags by reverse-transcription-PCR analysis of a panel of multiple independent mouse/human somatic cell hybrids containing a normal human Xi but no Xa. The resulting survey yields an initial X-inactivation profile that is estimated to represent approximately 10% of all X-linked transcripts. Of the 224 transcripts tested here, 34 (three of which are pseudoautosomal) were expressed in as many as nine Xi hybrids and thus appear to escape inactivation. The genes that escape inactivation are distributed nonrandomly along the X; 31 of 34 such transcripts map to Xp, implying that the two arms of the X are epigenetically and/or evolutionarily distinct and suggesting that genetic imbalance of Xp may be more severe clinically than imbalance of Xq. A complete X-inactivation profile will provide information relevant to clinical genetics and genetic counseling and should yield insight into the genomic and epigenetic organization of the X chromosome.