Ichiei Narita

Importance: The current standard induction therapy for antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis is the combination of high-dose glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide or rituximab. Although these regimens have high remission rates, they are associated with considerable adverse events presumably due to high-dose glucocorticoids. Objective: To compare efficacy and adverse events between a reduced-dose glucocorticoid plus rituximab regimen and the standard high-dose glucocorticoid plus rituximab regimen in remission induction of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a phase 4, multicenter, open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial. A total of 140 patients with newly diagnosed ANCA-associated vasculitis without severe glomerulonephritis or alveolar hemorrhage were enrolled between November 2014 and June 2019 at 21 hospitals in Japan. Follow-up ended in December 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive reduced-dose prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/d) plus rituximab (375 mg/m2/wk, 4 doses) (n = 70) or high-dose prednisolone (1 mg/kg/d) plus rituximab (n = 70). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the remission rate at 6 months, and the prespecified noninferiority margin was -20 percentage points. There were 8 secondary efficacy outcomes and 6 secondary safety outcomes, including serious adverse events and infections. Results: Among 140 patients who were randomized (median age, 73 years; 81 women [57.8%]), 134 (95.7%) completed the trial. At 6 months, 49 of 69 patients (71.0%) in the reduced-dose group and 45 of 65 patients (69.2%) in the high-dose group achieved remission with the protocolized treatments. The treatment difference of 1.8 percentage points (1-sided 97.5% CI, -13.7 to ∞) between the groups met the noninferiority criterion (P = .003 for noninferiority). Twenty-one serious adverse events occurred in 13 patients in the reduced-dose group (18.8%), while 41 occurred in 24 patients in the high-dose group (36.9%) (difference, -18.1% [95% CI, -33.0% to -3.2%]; P = .02). Seven serious infections occurred in 5 patients in the reduced-dose group (7.2%), while 20 occurred in 13 patients in the high-dose group (20.0%) (difference, -12.8% [95% CI, -24.2% to -1.3%]; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with newly diagnosed ANCA-associated vasculitis without severe glomerulonephritis or alveolar hemorrhage, a reduced-dose glucocorticoid plus rituximab regimen was noninferior to a high-dose glucocorticoid plus rituximab regimen with regard to induction of disease remission at 6 months. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02198248.

Background C3 glomerulopathy is an ultra-rare, severe form of glomerulonephritis caused by overactivation of the alternative complement pathway.We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of iptacopan (LNP023), an oral, proximal complement inhibitor that targets factor B to selectively inhibit the alternative pathway of the complement cascade.Methods APPEAR-C3G was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of iptacopan versus placebo (both in addition to supportive care [renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors] and immunosuppression).Adult participants (aged 18-60 years) with biopsy-confirmed C3 glomerulopathy were enrolled from 35 hospitals or medical centres in 18 countries.Inclusion criteria included reduced serum C3 concentration (ie, <77 mg/dL [defined as <085 lower limit of the central laboratory normal range]) at screening, urine proteincreatinine ratio (UPCR) of 10 g/g or higher at day -75 and day -15 before randomisation, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30 mL/min per 173 m or higher at screening and day -15, and vaccination against Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae.All eligible participants were randomised 1:1 via interactive response technology to either the iptacopan or the placebo group, stratified by treatment with corticosteroids, mycophenolic acid, or both (yes or no).During the 6-month double-blind period, participants orally received either iptacopan 200 mg twice daily or placebo; this was followed by a 6-month open-label period in which all participants received iptacopan 200 mg twice daily.The primary endpoint was relative reduction in proteinuria (measured by logtransformed ratio to baseline in UPCR sampled from a 24-h urine collection) at 6 months.The primary analyses were done in the full analysis set (ie, all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomisation); all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the safety analysis.This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04817618) and the adult cohort has been completed.Findings Between July 28, 2021, and Feb 15, 2023, 132 participants were screened, of whom 58 did not complete the screening period and 74 (64% male; 69% White) were randomised 1:1 to receive either iptacopan (n=38) or placebo (n=36).One participant in the placebo group discontinued treatment during the open-label period.The 24-h UPCR percentage change relative to baseline at 6 months was -302% (95% CI -428 to -148) in the iptacopan group and 76% (-119 to 313) in the placebo group.In the iptacopan group, the geometric mean of 24-h UPCR was 333 g/g (95% CI 279 to 397) at baseline and 217 g/g (162 to 291) at 6 months; in the placebo group, this was 258 g/g (218 to 305) at baseline and 280 g/g (237 to 330) at 6 months.The primary endpoint was met with a relative reduction in 24-h UPCR at 6 months for iptacopan versus placebo of 351% (138 to 511; p=00014).30 (79%) of 38 participants in the iptacopan group had treatment-emergent adverse events, compared with 24 (67%) of 36 participants in the placebo group; most of these were of mild or moderate severity.There were no deaths, no treatment discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events, and no meningococcal infections.Serious adverse events were reported in three (8%) participants in the iptacopan group and one (3%) participant in the placebo group.Interpretation Iptacopan showed a statistically significant, clinically meaningful proteinuria reduction in addition to RAAS inhibitors and immunosuppression at 6 months.Iptacopan was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile in patients with C3 glomerulopathy.

Key Points Little is known about the clinicopathological characteristics and renal outcomes in the patients with gross hematuria (GH) after the vaccination. To fill a clinicopathological knowledge gap regarding vaccination and GH, we conducted a nationwide multicenter prospective cohort study. GH is more likely to occur in patients with IgA nephropathy, with a female bias, but without progressive exacerbation of renal function. Background In the past 3 years, cases of gross hematuria (GH) after the vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) have been frequently reported worldwide. However, the postevent renal prognosis of these patients, their clinical backgrounds, and underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide multicenter prospective cohort study in Japan. Methods We analyzed laboratory findings at the time of the first presentation to the hospital and 3 and 6 months after in patients with GH after the vaccination and histopathological findings in their kidney biopsy specimens. Moreover, changes in pathological biomarkers of IgAN such as galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) and its immune complexes were also evaluated. Results During the study period, 127 newly presenting patients with GH after the vaccination were enrolled, with a clear female bias (73.2%). GH was observed after the second or subsequent vaccinations in most patients (92.9%). Of the 37 patients undergoing kidney biopsy before the vaccination, 36 patients had been diagnosed with IgAN/IgA vasculitis (IgAV). In the remaining 90 patients, 69 of the 70 who newly underwent kidney biopsy were diagnosed with IgAN ( n =67)/IgAV ( n =2). Their histopathology did not show a high incidence of acute lesions such as endocapillary hypercellularity and crescentic lesions. Most cases showed a temporary increase in proteinuria, but no sustained worsening in renal function. Among the biomarkers measured, serum Gd-IgA1 and immune complexes were comparable throughout the observation period; however, only urinary Gd-IgA1 was increased at the time of GH. Conclusions We found that GH after the vaccination is more likely to occur in patients with IgAN/IgAV, with a female bias, but without progressive exacerbation of renal function. Although further investigation is needed regarding causal relationship between vaccination and GH, this study provides many insights into the molecular mechanisms of GH.

) is poorly studied. We examined this association in patients with advanced CKD in Japan. We used the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity to assess baseline physical activity and classify patients as active or inactive. CKD progression was defined as 40% decline in eGFR, eGFR < 10, or requiring dialysis or transplantation. Among the 1,808 eligible patients, after adjusting for possible confounders, hazard ratios (HRs) for poor renal outcome in the active group were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.44-1.04), 1.09 (0.86-1.38), and 1.01 (0.82-1.25) in CKD stage G3b, G4, and G5, respectively, suggesting a renal benefit of exercise in CKD stage G3b. Adjusted HRs for death were 0.79 (0.40-1.57), 0.55 (0.38-0.80), and 0.75 (0.44-1.26) in stage G3b, G4, and G5, respectively. While the adjusted HRs of death were 0.84 (0.52-1.38) and 0.60 (0.43-0.83) in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, suggesting that exercise may reduce mortality in non-diabetic patients. Our study suggests that exercise is associated with better survival in non-diabetic patients with CKD stage G3b-5, and better renal outcome in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD stage G3b.

Importance: Estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) can differ according to whether creatinine or cystatin C is used for the eGFR calculation, but the prevalence and importance of these differences remain unclear. Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of a discordance between cystatin C-based eGFR (eGFRcys) and creatinine-based eGFR (eGFRcr), identify characteristics associated with greater discordance, and evaluate associations of discordance with adverse outcomes. Data Sources: Participants in the Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium (CKD-PC). Study Selection: Participants with concurrent cystatin C and creatinine measurements and clinical outcome measurement. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Between April 2024 and August 2025, data were synthesized using individual-level meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary independent measurement was a large negative eGFR difference (eGFRdiff), defined as an eGFRcys that was at least 30% lower than eGFRcr. Secondary (dependent) outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and kidney failure with replacement therapy. Results: A total of 821 327 individuals from 23 outpatient cohorts (mean [SD] age, 59 [12] years; 48% female; 13.5% with diabetes; 40% with hypertension) and 39 639 individuals from 2 inpatient cohorts (mean [SD] age, 67 [16] years; 31% female; 30% with diabetes; 72% with hypertension) were included. Among outpatient participants, 11% had a large negative eGFRdiff (range, 3%-50%). Among inpatients, 35% had a large negative eGFRdiff. Among outpatient participants, at a mean (SD) follow-up of 11 (4) years, a large negative eGFRdiff, compared with an eGFRdiff between -30% and 30%, was associated with higher rates of all-cause mortality (28.4 vs 16.8 per 1000 person-years [PY]; hazard ratio [HR], 1.69 [95% CI, 1.57-1.82]), cardiovascular mortality (6.1 vs 3.8 per 1000 PY; HR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.48-1.76]), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (13.3 vs 9.8 per 1000 PY; HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.27-1.44]), heart failure (13.2 vs 8.6 per 1000 PY; HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.40-1.68]), and kidney failure with replacement therapy (2.7 vs 2.1 per 1000 PY; HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.13-1.47]). Conclusions and Relevance: In the CKD-PC, 11% of outpatient participants and 35% of hospitalized patients had an eGFRcys that was at least 30% lower than their eGFRcr. In the outpatient setting, presence of eGFRcys at least 30% lower than eGFRcr was associated with significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and kidney failure.