J

Jeena Rajan

European Bioinformatics Institute

ORCID: 0000-0002-3613-0013

Publishes on Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms. 48 papers and 9.9k citations.

48Publications
9.9kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

GENCODE: The reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project
Jennifer Harrow, Adam Frankish, José M. González et al.|Genome Research|2012
Cited by 5kOpen Access

The GENCODE Consortium aims to identify all gene features in the human genome using a combination of computational analysis, manual annotation, and experimental validation. Since the first public release of this annotation data set, few new protein-coding loci have been added, yet the number of alternative splicing transcripts annotated has steadily increased. The GENCODE 7 release contains 20,687 protein-coding and 9640 long noncoding RNA loci and has 33,977 coding transcripts not represented in UCSC genes and RefSeq. It also has the most comprehensive annotation of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) loci publicly available with the predominant transcript form consisting of two exons. We have examined the completeness of the transcript annotation and found that 35% of transcriptional start sites are supported by CAGE clusters and 62% of protein-coding genes have annotated polyA sites. Over one-third of GENCODE protein-coding genes are supported by peptide hits derived from mass spectrometry spectra submitted to Peptide Atlas. New models derived from the Illumina Body Map 2.0 RNA-seq data identify 3689 new loci not currently in GENCODE, of which 3127 consist of two exon models indicating that they are possibly unannotated long noncoding loci. GENCODE 7 is publicly available from gencodegenes.org and via the Ensembl and UCSC Genome Browsers.

BlobToolKit – Interactive Quality Assessment of Genome Assemblies
Richard Challis, E. G. Richards, Jeena Rajan et al.|G3 Genes Genomes Genetics|2020
Cited by 2.4kOpen Access

Reconstruction of target genomes from sequence data produced by instruments that are agnostic as to the species-of-origin may be confounded by contaminant DNA. Whether introduced during sample processing or through co-extraction alongside the target DNA, if insufficient care is taken during the assembly process, the final assembled genome may be a mixture of data from several species. Such assemblies can confound sequence-based biological inference and, when deposited in public databases, may be included in downstream analyses by users unaware of underlying problems. We present BlobToolKit, a software suite to aid researchers in identifying and isolating non-target data in draft and publicly available genome assemblies. BlobToolKit can be used to process assembly, read and analysis files for fully reproducible interactive exploration in the browser-based Viewer. BlobToolKit can be used during assembly to filter non-target DNA, helping researchers produce assemblies with high biological credibility. We have been running an automated BlobToolKit pipeline on eukaryotic assemblies publicly available in the International Nucleotide Sequence Data Collaboration and are making the results available through a public instance of the Viewer at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view We aim to complete analysis of all publicly available genomes and then maintain currency with the flow of new genomes. We have worked to embed these views into the presentation of genome assemblies at the European Nucleotide Archive, providing an indication of assembly quality alongside the public record with links out to allow full exploration in the Viewer.

The consensus coding sequence (CCDS) project: Identifying a common protein-coding gene set for the human and mouse genomes
Kim D. Pruitt, Jennifer Harrow, Rachel Harte et al.|Genome Research|2009
Cited by 590Open Access

Effective use of the human and mouse genomes requires reliable identification of genes and their products. Although multiple public resources provide annotation, different methods are used that can result in similar but not identical representation of genes, transcripts, and proteins. The collaborative consensus coding sequence (CCDS) project tracks identical protein annotations on the reference mouse and human genomes with a stable identifier (CCDS ID), and ensures that they are consistently represented on the NCBI, Ensembl, and UCSC Genome Browsers. Importantly, the project coordinates on manually reviewing inconsistent protein annotations between sites, as well as annotations for which new evidence suggests a revision is needed, to progressively converge on a complete protein-coding set for the human and mouse reference genomes, while maintaining a high standard of reliability and biological accuracy. To date, the project has identified 20,159 human and 17,707 mouse consensus coding regions from 17,052 human and 16,893 mouse genes. Three evaluation methods indicate that the entries in the CCDS set are highly likely to represent real proteins, more so than annotations from contributing groups not included in CCDS. The CCDS database thus centralizes the function of identifying well-supported, identically-annotated, protein-coding regions.

Specimen and sample metadata standards for biodiversity genomics: a proposal from the Darwin Tree of Life project
Mara Lawniczak, Robert Davey, Jeena Rajan et al.|Wellcome Open Research|2022
Cited by 335Open Access

<ns4:p> The vision of the <ns4:ext-link xmlns:ns5="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" ns5:href="https://www.earthbiogenome.org/">Earth BioGenome Project</ns4:ext-link> <ns4:sup>1</ns4:sup> is to complete reference genomes for all of the planet’s ~2M described eukaryotic species in the coming decade. To contribute to this global endeavour, the <ns4:ext-link xmlns:ns5="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" ns5:href="https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/JGLTC82o95fXARy0XI1hqWb?domain=darwintreeoflife.org/">Darwin Tree of Life Project </ns4:ext-link> (DToL <ns4:sup>2</ns4:sup> ) was launched in 2019 with the aim of generating complete genomes for the ~70k described eukaryotic species that can be found in Britain and Ireland. One of the early tasks of the DToL project was to determine, define, and standardise the important metadata that must accompany every sample contributing to this ambitious project. This ensures high-quality contextual information is available for the associated data, enabling a richer set of information upon which to search and filter datasets as well as enabling interoperability between datasets used for downstream analysis. Here we describe some of the key factors we considered in the process of determining, defining, and documenting the metadata required for DToL project samples. The manifest and Standard Operating Procedure that are referred to throughout this paper are likely to be useful for other projects, and we encourage re-use while maintaining the standards and rules set out here. </ns4:p>

Current status and new features of the Consensus Coding Sequence database
Catherine M. Farrell, Nuala A. O’Leary, Rachel Harte et al.|Nucleic Acids Research|2013
Cited by 159Open Access

The Consensus Coding Sequence (CCDS) project (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CCDS/) is a collaborative effort to maintain a dataset of protein-coding regions that are identically annotated on the human and mouse reference genome assemblies by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and Ensembl genome annotation pipelines. Identical annotations that pass quality assurance tests are tracked with a stable identifier (CCDS ID). Members of the collaboration, who are from NCBI, the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and the University of California Santa Cruz, provide coordinated and continuous review of the dataset to ensure high-quality CCDS representations. We describe here the current status and recent growth in the CCDS dataset, as well as recent changes to the CCDS web and FTP sites. These changes include more explicit reporting about the NCBI and Ensembl annotation releases being compared, new search and display options, the addition of biologically descriptive information and our approach to representing genes for which support evidence is incomplete. We also present a summary of recent and future curation targets.