Berndt Birkner

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Screening colonoscopy with polypectomy has been shown to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with colorectal cancer. However, there is a lack of large and systematic prospective studies of the complications of polypectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on all snare polypectomies performed in 13 institutions (six hospitals and seven gastroenterology offices) were recorded prospectively during a 20-month period, including data on a 30-day follow-up period. The primary end points of the study were polypectomy complications, which were classed as "major" or "minor". Risk factors for complications were analyzed for both patient characteristics and polyp parameters. RESULTS: A total of 3976 snare polypectomies in 2257 patients (mean age 64.5 years) were included in the study. The mean polyp size was 1.1 cm, and 72% were sessile. Complications occurred in 9.7% of patients (6.1% of polyps); 75% of these complications were minor; and the mortality rate was zero. Multivariate regression analysis revealed polyp size as the main risk factor, both for complications overall (odds ratio 6.56, 95%CI 4.45-9.67) and for major complications (odds ratio 31.01, 95%CI 7.53-128.1). Right-sided polyp location was a significant risk factor for major complications (odds ratio 2.40, 95%CI 1.34-4.28). Setting a cut-off value of 3% as an acceptable rate for major complications, polyps larger than 1 cm in the right colon or 2 cm in the left colon, and multiple polyps carried an increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopic polypectomy is associated with a 10% rate of complications, but three-quarters of these are of minor clinical significance. More than 90% of the complications can be managed conservatively if adequate endoscopic expertise is available. Guidelines for intensified follow-up after polypectomy should be based on the size, location, and number of a patient's polyps.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical outcome of dietary fiber therapy in patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: One hundred, forty-nine patients with chronic constipation (age 53 yr, range 18-81 yr, 84% women) at two gastroenterology departments in Munich, Germany, were treated with Plantago ovata seeds, 15-30 g/day, for a period of at least 6 wk. Repeated symptom evaluation, oroanal transit time measurement (radiopaque markers), and functional rectoanal evaluation (proctoscopy, manometry, defecography) were performed. Patients were classified on the basis of the result of dietary fiber treatment: no effect, n = 84; improved, n = 33; and symptom free, n = 32. RESULTS: Eighty percent of patients with slow transit and 63% of patients with a disorder of defecation did not respond to dietary fiber treatment, whereas 85% of patients without a pathological finding improved or became symptom free. CONCLUSION: Slow GI transit and/or a disorder of defecation may explain a poor outcome of dietary fiber therapy in patients with chronic constipation. A dietary fiber trial should be conducted before technical investigations, which are indicated only if the dietary fiber trial fails.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Data on process quality and complications of colonoscopies are sparse, especially for the screening setting. We describe process quality in routine care, estimate the incidence of acute complications, and identify risk indicators for substandard care and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 236 087 compulsory health insurance (CHI) members who underwent colonoscopies in 2006. Data were documented prospectively in the Electronic Colonoscopy Documentation of the Bavarian Association of CHI Physicians, a registry of outpatient colonoscopies performed in practices throughout Bavaria, Germany. It covers demographic characteristics, indications, quality indicators, macroscopic and histological findings, diagnoses, and acute complications. RESULTS: Colon preparation resulted in clear bowels in 76.31 % of patients, liquid residues in 22.22 %, and dirty bowels in 1.47 %. In total, 92.85 % of the examinations were performed with patients under sedation/analgesia and 97.43 % of colonoscopies were complete. Photo documentation was present for 98.87 %. Male sex, middle age, screening, satisfactory bowel preparation, and sedation/analgesia were associated with completeness. A total of 735 patients (0.31 %) suffered complications, among them 520 bleedings (0.22 %), 69 perforations (0.03 %), and 152 cardiorespiratory complications (0.06 %). Male sex, higher age, nonscreening indication, biopsies, polypectomies, and absence of sedation/analgesia were indicative of a higher bleeding risk. Perforations were also related to biopsies and polypectomies. Higher age was the only discernible risk indicator for cardiorespiratory events. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient colonoscopy is a safe procedure with a low risk of acute complications. Improving bowel preparation enhances completeness. Sedation/analgesia is conducive to both completeness and the lowering of the risk of acute complications.

The quality of reprocessing gastroscopes, colonoscopes and duodenoscopes in daily routine of 25 endoscopy departments in hospitals and 30 doctors with their own practices was evaluated by microbiological testing in the HYGEA interventional study. In 2 test periods, endoscopes ready for use in patients were found contaminated at high rates (period 1: 49 % of 152 endoscopes; period 2: 39 % of 154 endoscopes). Culture of bacterial fecal flora (E. coli, coliform enterobacteriaceae, enterococci) was interpreted indicating failure of cleaning procedure and disinfection of endoscopes. Detection of Pseudomonas spp. (especially P. aeruginosa) and other non-fermenting rods - indicating microbially insufficient final rinsing and incomplete drying of the endoscope or a contaminated flushing equipment for the air/water-channel - pointed out endoscope recontamination during reprocessing or afterwards. Cause for complaint was found in more than 50 % of endoscopy facilities tested (period 2: 5 in hospitals, 25 practices). Reprocessing endoscopes in fully automatic chemo-thermally decontaminating washer-disinfectors with disinfection of final rinsing water led to much better results than manual or semi-automatic procedures (failure rate of endoscopy facilities in period 2 : 3 of 28 with fully automatic, 8 of 12 with manual, 9 of 15 with semi-automatic reprocessing). The study results give evidence for the following recommendations: 1. Manual brushing of all accessible endoscope channels has to be performed even before further automatic reprocessing; 2. For final endoscope rinsing, water or aqua dest. should only be used disinfected or sterile-filtered; 3. Endoscopes have to be dried thoroughly using compressed air prior to storage; 4. Bottle and tube for air/water-channel flushing have to be reprocessed daily by disinfection or sterilization, and in use, the bottle have to be filled exclusively with sterile water. The HYGEA study shows that microbiological testing of endoscopes is useful for detection of insufficient reprocessing and should be performed for quality assurance in doctors' practices, too. The study put recommendations for reprocessing procedures in more concrete terms.