M

Magnús K. Magnússon

University of Iceland

ORCID: 0000-0001-8593-4934

Publishes on Cancer Cells and Metastasis, Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Iron Metabolism and Disorders. 100 papers and 6.6k citations.

100Publications
6.6kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations
Cited by 492Open Access

Abstract High-throughput proteomics platforms measuring thousands of proteins in plasma combined with genomic and phenotypic information have the power to bridge the gap between the genome and diseases. Here we performed association studies of Olink Explore 3072 data generated by the UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project 1 on plasma samples from more than 50,000 UK Biobank participants with phenotypic and genotypic data, stratifying on British or Irish, African and South Asian ancestries. We compared the results with those of a SomaScan v4 study on plasma from 36,000 Icelandic people 2 , for 1,514 of whom Olink data were also available. We found modest correlation between the two platforms. Although cis protein quantitative trait loci were detected for a similar absolute number of assays on the two platforms (2,101 on Olink versus 2,120 on SomaScan), the proportion of assays with such supporting evidence for assay performance was higher on the Olink platform (72% versus 43%). A considerable number of proteins had genomic associations that differed between the platforms. We provide examples where differences between platforms may influence conclusions drawn from the integration of protein levels with the study of diseases. We demonstrate how leveraging the diverse ancestries of participants in the UK Biobank helps to detect novel associations and refine genomic location. Our results show the value of the information provided by the two most commonly used high-throughput proteomics platforms and demonstrate the differences between them that at times provides useful complementarity.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Iceland, 1990–2003: The Icelandic GIST study, a population‐based incidence and pathologic risk stratification study
Geir Tryggvason, Hjörtur Gíslason, Magnús K. Magnússon et al.|International Journal of Cancer|2005
Cited by 360Open Access

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a newly defined clinical and pathologic entity. This study examines the whole population-based incidence of GIST as well as pathologic risk stratification schemes. All patients diagnosed in Iceland with a gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor over the years 1990-2003 were evaluated with an immunohistochemical panel including staining for c-kit. The age-adjusted incidence of GIST was calculated. Size, mitotic rate per 50 HPF and various other pathologic parameters were evaluated. Each tumor was categorized into 1 of 4 recently defined NIH risk stratification categories. Fifty-seven of the mesenchymal gastrointestinal tumors were positive for c-kit and therefore categorized as GIST. The annual incidence for the study period is 1.1 per 100,000. The median age of patients was 65.8 years and median tumor size was 4.6 cm. Only 2 of 35 gastric tumors fall into the NIH high-risk category while half of the nongastric tumors (11 of 22) fall into this high-risk category. Eight of the 57 tumors (14%) metastasized, 7 of which were nongastric. The positive predictive value for malignant behavior of the high-risk category is 46%. The negative predictive value of low- and very-low-risk NIH category is 100%. Pathologic predictors of malignant behavior are tumor size, mitotic rate, mucosal disruption, necrosis and high cellularity. Nongastric GISTs are clearly at much higher risk of a malignant behavior than gastric GISTs. This population-based GIST study estimates the incidence of GISTs at 1.1 per 100,000 and furthermore supports the NIH consensus categories for the prediction of malignant behavior of GISTs.

Fibronectin
Magnús K. Magnússon, Deane F. Mosher|Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology|1998
Cited by 301

I n the past 2 decades, it has been appreciated that the functions of the extracellular matrix (ECM) are not entirely structural.ECM components interact with specific adhesion receptors on cell surfaces and regulate various cellular functions, including differentiation, proliferation, migration, and apoptosis.Fibronectin (FN) is a paradigm adhesive protein, nonreactive with adhesion receptors in its soluble state but highly adhesive when insoluble.Polymerization of FN into the ECM must be tightly regulated to ensure that the adhesive information in the ECM is appropriate.FN exists in a soluble protomeric form in micromolar concentration in blood plasma and in an insoluble multimeric form in the ECM. 1,2Unlike fibrillar or basement membrane collagens, laminins, actin, and tubulin, circulating FN does not self-polymerize in physiologically relevant solutions.Furthermore, there is little passive accumulation of FN in preexisting ECM.Rather, assembly of FN takes place at specialized areas on the cell surface. 3FN is especially abundant in the ECM of embryonic and regenerating or injured tissues, although it can be found in most ECMs, including basement membranes.FN interacts with cells through integrins, heterodimeric transmembrane receptors linking the ECM to the intracellular cytoskeleton and signaling pathways.The aim of this review is to describe the mechanisms and consequences of FN deposition and give a brief overview of the significance of FN for selected areas of cardiovascular research.In the first section we describe important features of the FN molecule that account for its multiple functions.Next, we focus on the assembly process, ie, the conversion of soluble FN to its active, adhesive, insoluble form.Finally, we discuss several areas of cardiovascular research in which FN may have an important role, exemplifying how the adhesive information of FN can drive pathophysiological processes.