M

Mark S. Smeltzer

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

ORCID: 0000-0002-0878-0692

Publishes on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus, Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing, Orthopedic Infections and Treatments. 167 papers and 11.1k citations.

167Publications
11.1kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

The <i>cidA</i> murein hydrolase regulator contributes to DNA release and biofilm development in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>
Kelly C. Rice, Ethan E. Mann, Jennifer L. Endres et al.|Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|2007
Cited by 670Open Access

The Staphylococcus aureus cidA and lrgA genes have been shown to affect cell lysis under a variety of conditions during planktonic growth. It is hypothesized that these genes encode holins and antiholins, respectively, and may serve as molecular control elements of bacterial cell lysis. To examine the biological role of cell death and lysis, we studied the impact of the cidA mutation on biofilm development. Interestingly, this mutation had a dramatic impact on biofilm morphology and adherence. The cidA mutant (KB1050) biofilm exhibited a rougher appearance compared with the parental strain (UAMS-1) and was less adherent. Propidium iodide staining revealed that KB1050 accumulated more dead cells within the biofilm population relative to UAMS-1, indicative of reduced cell lysis. In agreement with this finding, quantitative real-time PCR experiments demonstrated the presence of 5-fold less genomic DNA in the KB1050 biofilm relative to UAMS-1. Furthermore, treatment of the UAMS-1 biofilm with DNase I caused extensive cell detachment, whereas similar treatment of the KB1050 biofilm had only a modest effect. These results demonstrate that cidA-controlled cell lysis plays a significant role during biofilm development and that released genomic DNA is an important structural component of S. aureus biofilm.

Global Gene Expression in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Biofilms
Karen E. Beenken, Paul M. Dunman, Fionnuala McAleese et al.|Journal of Bacteriology|2004
Cited by 578Open Access

We previously demonstrated that mutation of the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sarA) in a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus (UAMS-1) results in an impaired capacity to form a biofilm in vitro (K. E. Beenken, J. S. Blevins, and M. S. Smeltzer, Infect. Immun. 71:4206-4211, 2003). In this report, we used a murine model of catheter-based biofilm formation to demonstrate that a UAMS-1 sarA mutant also has a reduced capacity to form a biofilm in vivo. Surprisingly, mutation of the UAMS-1 ica locus had little impact on biofilm formation in vitro or in vivo. In an effort to identify additional loci that might be relevant to biofilm formation and/or the adaptive response required for persistence of S. aureus within a biofilm, we isolated total cellular RNA from UAMS-1 harvested from a biofilm grown in a flow cell and compared the transcriptional profile of this RNA to RNA isolated from both exponential- and stationary-phase planktonic cultures. Comparisons were done using a custom-made Affymetrix GeneChip representing the genomic complement of six strains of S. aureus (COL, N315, Mu50, NCTC 8325, EMRSA-16 [strain 252], and MSSA-476). The results confirm that the sessile lifestyle associated with persistence within a biofilm is distinct by comparison to the lifestyles of both the exponential and postexponential phases of planktonic culture. Indeed, we identified 48 genes in which expression was induced at least twofold in biofilms over expression under both planktonic conditions. Similarly, we identified 84 genes in which expression was repressed by a factor of at least 2 compared to expression under both planktonic conditions. A primary theme that emerged from the analysis of these genes is that persistence within a biofilm requires an adaptive response that limits the deleterious effects of the reduced pH associated with anaerobic growth conditions.

Modulation of eDNA Release and Degradation Affects Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Maturation
Cited by 496Open Access

Recent studies have demonstrated a role for Staphylococcus aureus cidA-mediated cell lysis and genomic DNA release in biofilm adherence. The current study extends these findings by examining both temporal and additional genetic factors involved in the control of genomic DNA release and degradation during biofilm maturation. Cell lysis and DNA release were found to be critical for biofilm attachment during the initial stages of development and the released DNA (eDNA) remained an important matrix component during biofilm maturation. This study also revealed that an lrgAB mutant exhibits increased biofilm adherence and matrix-associated eDNA consistent with its proposed role as an inhibitor of cidA-mediated lysis. In flow-cell assays, both cid and lrg mutations had dramatic effects on biofilm maturation and tower formation. Finally, staphylococcal thermonuclease was shown to be involved in biofilm development as a nuc mutant formed a thicker biofilm containing increased levels of matrix-associated eDNA. Together, these findings suggest a model in which the opposing activities of the cid and lrg gene products control cell lysis and genomic DNA release during biofilm development, while staphylococcal thermonuclease functions to degrade the eDNA, possibly as a means to promote biofilm dispersal.

Mutation of <i>sarA</i> in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Limits Biofilm Formation
Karen E. Beenken, Jon S. Blevins, Mark S. Smeltzer|Infection and Immunity|2003
Cited by 419Open Access

Mutation of sarA resulted in a reduced capacity to form a biofilm in six of the eight Staphylococcus aureus strains we tested (UAMS-1, UAMS-601, SA113, SC-01, S6C, and DB). The exceptions were Newman, which formed a poor biofilm under all conditions, and RN6390, which consistently formed a biofilm only after mutation of agr. Mutation of agr in other strains had little impact on biofilm formation. In every strain other than Newman, including RN6390, simultaneous mutation of sarA and agr resulted in a phenotype like that observed with the sarA mutants. Complementation studies using a sarA clone confirmed that the defect in biofilm formation was due to the sarA mutation.