Jakub Baudys

CD22 represents a promising target for antibody-drug conjugate therapy in the context of B cell malignancies since it rapidly internalizes, importing specifically bound antibodies with it. To determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of anti-CD22-MCC-DM1 and MC-MMAF conjugates, various approaches to quantifying total and conjugated antibody were investigated. Although the total antibody assay formats gave similar results for both conjugates, the mouse pharmacokinetic profile for the anti-CD22-MCC-DM1 and MC-MMAF appeared significantly different depending on the conjugated antibody assay format. Since these differences significantly impacted the PK parameters determination, we investigated the effect of the drug/antibody ratio on the total and conjugated antibody quantification using multiple assay formats. Our investigations revealed the limitations of some assay formats to quantify anti-CD22-MCC-DM1 and MC-MMAF with different drug load and in the context of a heterogeneous ADC population highlight the need to carefully plan the assay strategy for the total and conjugated antibody quantification in order to accurately determine the ADC PK parameters.

(SF9) insect cells. These results provide useful information for the study of the interactions of SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins and for the development of effective vaccines and therapeutics.

New technology is currently being marketed to rapidly test oral fluids for drugs of abuse at the point of collection (POC). There are no nationally accepted standards or cutoff concentrations for detecting drugs in oral fluids and for most analytes there are significant differences in cutoff concentrations across devices. Four devices were evaluated (OralLab), RapiScan, Drugwipe, and SalivaScreen) for their ability to meet manufacturers claims, and proposed federal standards for criminal justice and workplace programs. Human oral fluid fortified with known quantities of drug [drug(s) or metabolite(s)] was used to test these devices. Overall, the performance of these rapid POC oral fluid drug-testing devices was quite variable. Some devices performed well for the analysis of some drug classes but poorly for others. In general, most devices performed well for the detection of methamphetamine and opiates, but all performed poorly for the detection of cannabinoids. The ability to accurately and reliably detect cocaine and amphetamine was dependent on the individual device.