Raj Jatale

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in improving efficacy and cost-effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data on perceptions and barriers to TDM use are limited and no data are available from India. Our objective was to assess clinicians' attitudes and barriers to TDM use in IBD. METHODS: A 16-question survey was distributed to members of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology. Information on clinician characteristics, demographics, use and barriers towards TDM with anti-TNFs was collected. Logistic regression was used to predict factors influencing TDM use. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-two respondents participated (92.5% male); 83% were consultant gastroenterologists. Of 104 respondents meeting inclusion criteria (treating > 5 IBD patients and at least 1 with an anti-TNF per month), complete responses were available for 101 participants. TDM was utilized by 20% (n = 20) of respondents. Of them, 89.5% (n = 17) used TDM for secondary loss of response; 73.7% (n = 14) for primary non-response and 5.3% (n = 1) proactively. Barriers to TDM use were cost (71.2%), availability (67.8%), time lag in results (58.7%) and the perception that TDM is time-consuming (45.7%). Clinicians treating > 30 IBD patients were more likely to check TDM (OR = 4.9, p = 0.02). Of 81 respondents not using TDM, 97.5% (n = 79) would do so if all the barriers were removed. CONCLUSION: Significant barriers to TDM use were availability, cost and time lag for results. If these barriers were removed, almost all the clinicians would use TDM at least reactively and 25% would use proactively. There is an urgent need to address these barriers and optimize anti-TNF therapy for optimal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Free-flap reconstructions (FFRs) are the standard-of-care following resections for oral cancer. This study assessed an alternative, the pedicled submental flap (SF) for its versatility, oncological outcomes, and comparative operative time and cost. METHODS: This was a longitudinal prospective study of 1169 patients of oral cancer reconstructed with the SF. Oncological outcomes in terms of recurrence rate and disease-free survival (DFS), were analyzed in 730 cases with a minimum of 18 months follow-up. Surgical time and cost were compared between 20 SFs and 14 FFRs performed consecutively. RESULTS: SF was used to reconstruct defects in the cheek (29.2%), mandible (41.6%), tongue (26.3%) and palate (2.7%) with a 94% flap survival. N+ at level 1 did not adversely affect the recurrence rate as compared with N+ at levels other than level 1 (27.52% vs 29.81%). SFs took a shorter time (186 minutes vs 474 minutes) and cost significantly less than FFRs (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: SF can reconstruct various oral defects, is sturdy, and esthetically and functionally satisfactory. The procedure time is much shorter than for FFR and costs considerably less. With careful case selection and meticulous clearance, SF reconstruction is oncologically safe even in N+ neck.

Background: Accurate molecular testing in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is of paramount importance for treatment, prediction, and prognostication. Objectives: We aimed to comprehensively describe the clinicopathological and molecular profile of Indian patients with NSCLC with regard to alterations in the epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK), and c-ros oncogene 1 ( ROS1 ). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of lung tissue samples tested between January 2015 and December 2021 at the Metropolis Healthcare Limited global referral laboratory facility in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Testing was conducted for EGFR by real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Sanger sequencing , ALK by immunohistochemistry (IHC), ALK by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) by FISH. We analyzed the positivity status and determined the trends in the results of the molecular targets in NSCLC cases. Results: Out of 3220 samples with malignancy, 1750 (54.3%) were tested for EGFR , out of which 510 (29.1%) were positive. The most common mutation detected was in exon 19 of EGFR (334/510, 65.5%), followed by exon 21 (164/510, 32.2%). A total of 1548 (48.1%) cases were tested for ALK by IHC, of which 125/1548 (8.1%) showed positivity, while among the 372/3220 (11.6%) cases tested for ALK by FISH, 29/372 (7.8%) were positive. In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the ALK positivity rate by IHC was 5.3%. Of the 372 cases tested for ALK by FISH, 353 (94.9%) cases were tested for ALK by IHC as well; 98.9% concordance was observed for the positive cases. ROS1 testing was conducted in 370/3220 (11.5%) samples and showed a low positivity rate of 13/370 (3.5%). Conclusions: Indian patients with NSCLC have 29% EGFR positivity, 8.1% ALK positivity, and 3.5% ROS1 positivity, when tested with RT-PCR, IHC, and FISH, respectively. A detailed molecular analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) may help detect a higher number of molecular targets amenable to therapy.