J

Jenny I. Shen

UCLA Medical Center

ORCID: 0000-0002-2993-403X

Publishes on Dialysis and Renal Disease Management, Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes, Acute Kidney Injury Research. 163 papers and 5.8k citations.

163Publications
5.8kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, Albuminuria, and Adverse Outcomes
Cited by 293Open Access

Importance: Chronic kidney disease (low estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] or albuminuria) affects approximately 14% of adults in the US. Objective: To evaluate associations of lower eGFR based on creatinine alone, lower eGFR based on creatinine combined with cystatin C, and more severe albuminuria with adverse kidney outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes, and other health outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Individual-participant data meta-analysis of 27 503 140 individuals from 114 global cohorts (eGFR based on creatinine alone) and 720 736 individuals from 20 cohorts (eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C) and 9 067 753 individuals from 114 cohorts (albuminuria) from 1980 to 2021. Exposures: The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration 2021 equations for eGFR based on creatinine alone and eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C; and albuminuria estimated as urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR). Main Outcomes and Measures: The risk of kidney failure requiring replacement therapy, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, acute kidney injury, any hospitalization, coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and peripheral artery disease. The analyses were performed within each cohort and summarized with random-effects meta-analyses. Results: Within the population using eGFR based on creatinine alone (mean age, 54 years [SD, 17 years]; 51% were women; mean follow-up time, 4.8 years [SD, 3.3 years]), the mean eGFR was 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (SD, 22 mL/min/1.73 m2) and the median UACR was 11 mg/g (IQR, 8-16 mg/g). Within the population using eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C (mean age, 59 years [SD, 12 years]; 53% were women; mean follow-up time, 10.8 years [SD, 4.1 years]), the mean eGFR was 88 mL/min/1.73 m2 (SD, 22 mL/min/1.73 m2) and the median UACR was 9 mg/g (IQR, 6-18 mg/g). Lower eGFR (whether based on creatinine alone or based on creatinine and cystatin C) and higher UACR were each significantly associated with higher risk for each of the 10 adverse outcomes, including those in the mildest categories of chronic kidney disease. For example, among people with a UACR less than 10 mg/g, an eGFR of 45 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 based on creatinine alone was associated with significantly higher hospitalization rates compared with an eGFR of 90 to 104 mL/min/1.73 m2 (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.2-1.3]; 161 vs 79 events per 1000 person-years; excess absolute risk, 22 events per 1000 person-years [95% CI, 19-25 events per 1000 person-years]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective analysis of 114 cohorts, lower eGFR based on creatinine alone, lower eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C, and more severe UACR were each associated with increased rates of 10 adverse outcomes, including adverse kidney outcomes, cardiovascular diseases, and hospitalizations.

Chronic kidney disease and arrhythmias: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference
Mintu P. Turakhia, Peter J. Blankestijn, Juan Jesús Carrero et al.|European Heart Journal|2018
Cited by 285Open Access

eCrCl (mL/min) a Warfarin Apixaban b Dabigatran Edoxaban c Rivaroxaban >95 Adjusted dose (INR 2-3) 5 mg b.i.d. 150 mg b.i.d. 60 mg QD d 20 mg QD 51-95 Adjusted dose (INR 2-3) 5 mg b.i.d. 150 mg b.i.d. 60 mg QD 20 mg QD 31-50 Adjusted dose (INR 2-3) 5 mg b.i.d.(eCrCl cut-off 25 mL/min) 150 mg b.i.d. or 110 mg b.i.d. e 30 mg QD 15 mg QD INR, international normalized ratio. a Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl). b Apixaban dose modification from 5 mg b.i.d. to 2.5 mg b.i.d. if patient has any two of the following: serum creatinine > _1.5 mg/dL, age > _80 years, or body weight < _60 kg. c In the ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48 study, the dose was halved if any of the following: eCrCl of 30-50 mL/min, body weight < _60 kg, or concomitant use of verapamil or quinidine (potent P-glycoprotein inhibitors). d This dose has not been approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration in this category of kidney function. e In countries where 110 mg b.i.d. is approved, clinicians may prefer this dose after clinical assessment of thromboembolic vs bleeding risk. This dose has not been approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Implementing core outcomes in kidney disease: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) implementation workshop
Allison Tong, Braden Manns, Angela Yee‐Moon Wang et al.|Kidney International|2018
Cited by 203Open Access

There are an estimated 14,000 randomized trials published in chronic kidney disease. The most frequently reported outcomes are biochemical endpoints, rather than clinical and patient-reported outcomes including cardiovascular disease, mortality, and quality of life. While many trials have focused on optimizing kidney health, the heterogeneity and uncertain relevance of outcomes reported across trials may limit their policy and practice impact. The international Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) Initiative was formed to identify core outcomes that are critically important to patients and health professionals, to be reported consistently across trials. We convened a SONG Implementation Workshop to discuss the implementation of core outcomes. Eighty-two patients/caregivers and health professionals participated in plenary and breakout discussions. In this report, we summarize the findings of the workshop in two main themes: socializing the concept of core outcomes, and demonstrating feasibility and usability. We outline implementation strategies and pathways to be established through partnership with stakeholders, which may bolster acceptance and reporting of core outcomes in trials, and encourage their use by end-users such as guideline producers and policymakers to help improve patient-important outcomes.