Axel Preßler

Myocardial diseases are associated with an increased risk of potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death/cardiac arrest during exercise, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, left ventricular non-compaction, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, and myo-pericarditis. Practicing cardiologists and sport physicians are required to identify high-risk individuals harbouring these cardiac diseases in a timely fashion in the setting of preparticipation screening or medical consultation and provide appropriate advice regarding the participation in competitive sport activities and/or regular exercise programmes. Many asymptomatic (or mildly symptomatic) patients with cardiomyopathies aspire to participate in leisure-time and amateur sport activities to take advantage of the multiple benefits of a physically active lifestyle. In 2005, The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published recommendations for participation in competitive sport in athletes with cardiomyopathies and myo-pericarditis. One decade on, these recommendations are partly obsolete given the evolving knowledge of the diagnosis, management and treatment of cardiomyopathies and myo-pericarditis. The present document, therefore, aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the most updated recommendations for practicing cardiologists and sport physicians managing athletes with cardiomyopathies and myo-pericarditis and provides pragmatic advice for safe participation in competitive sport at professional and amateur level, as well as in a variety of recreational physical activities.

Background: Small studies have suggested that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate continuous training (MCT) in reversing cardiac remodeling and increasing aerobic capacity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The present multicenter trial compared 12 weeks of supervised interventions of HIIT, MCT, or a recommendation of regular exercise (RRE). Methods: Two hundred sixty-one patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and New York Heart Association class II to III were randomly assigned to HIIT at 90% to 95% of maximal heart rate, MCT at 60% to 70% of maximal heart rate, or RRE. Thereafter, patients were encouraged to continue exercising on their own. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline, after the intervention, and at follow-up after 52 weeks. Primary end point was a between-group comparison of change in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter from baseline to 12 weeks. Results: Groups did not differ in age (median, 60 years), sex (19% women), ischemic pathogenesis (59%), or medication. Change in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter from baseline to 12 weeks was not different between HIIT and MCT ( P =0.45); left ventricular end-diastolic diameter changes compared with RRE were −2.8 mm (−5.2 to −0.4 mm; P =0.02) in HIIT and −1.2 mm (−3.6 to 1.2 mm; P =0.34) in MCT. There was also no difference between HIIT and MCT in peak oxygen uptake ( P =0.70), but both were superior to RRE. However, none of these changes was maintained at follow-up after 52 weeks. Serious adverse events were not statistically different during supervised intervention or at follow-up at 52 weeks (HIIT, 39%; MCT, 25%; RRE, 34%; P =0.16). Training records showed that 51% of patients exercised below prescribed target during supervised HIIT and 80% above target in MCT. Conclusions: HIIT was not superior to MCT in changing left ventricular remodeling or aerobic capacity, and its feasibility remains unresolved in patients with heart failure. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00917046.

INTRODUCTION: Strenuous exercise induces significant increases in cardiac biomarkers. However, it is still unclear whether this is caused by cardiomyocyte necrosis or secondary mechanisms such as ischemia, cardiac energy deficiency, increased inflammation, or renal dysfunction. METHODS: Therefore, we investigated cardiac biomarkers (high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (h-FABP)), inflammation markers (high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor-α), and renal function (cystatin C) in 102 healthy men age 42 ± 9 yr before and 0, 24, and 72 h after a marathon. RESULTS: Kinetics of hs-cTnT revealed a peak immediately after the race (V3) that decreased rapidly to pretest values within 72 h (V5) (median (interquartile range) = 31.07 (19.25-46.86) ng·L(-1) at V3 and 3.61 (3.20-6.70) ng·L(-1) at V5, P < 0.001). NT-proBNP and h-FABP kinetics showed a similar pattern (NT-proBNP = 92.6 (56.9-149.7) ng·L(-1) at V3 and 34.9 (21.7-54.5) ng·L(-1) at V5; h-FABP = 44.99 (32.19-64.42) μg·L(-1) at V3 and 7.66 (5.64-10.60) μg·L(-1) at V5; always P < 0.001). Proinflammatory markers, such as IL-6 and hs-CRP, and renal dysfunction were significantly augmented immediately after the race (before the race compared with maximum after the race: IL-6 = 15.5-fold, hs-CRP = 28-fold, cystatin C = 1.22-fold, all P < 0.001). These increases were not related to the increase of hs-cTnT. Similarly, training history, finishing time, and exercise intensity were not associated with changes of hs-cTnT. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac biomarkers were increased immediately after a marathon race. Interestingly, values returned to normal levels within 72 h. These kinetics with a sharp peak indicate that cardiac necrosis during marathon running seems very unlikely but may be explained by altered myocyte metabolism.