Joshua Klopper

CONTEXT: Thyroid nodules are common in adults, but only a small fraction of them are malignant. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with cytological evaluation is the most reliable tool for cancer diagnosis in thyroid nodules. However, 10-40% of nodules are diagnosed as indeterminate by cytology, making it difficult to optimally manage these patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility and role of testing for tumor-specific mutations in improving the FNA diagnosis of thyroid nodules. DESIGN: The prospective study included 470 FNA samples of thyroid nodules from 328 patients. At the time of aspiration, a small portion of the material was collected and tested for BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, and PAX8/PPARgamma mutations. The mutational status was correlated with cytology and either surgical pathology diagnosis or follow-up (mean, 34 months). RESULTS: A sufficient amount of nucleic acids were isolated in 98% of samples. Thirty-two mutations were found, including 18 BRAF, eight RAS, five RET/PTC, and one PAX8/PPARgamma. The presence of any mutation was a strong indicator of cancer because 31 (97%) of mutation-positive nodules had a malignant diagnosis after surgery. A combination of cytology and molecular testing showed significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy and allowed better prediction of malignancy in the nodules with indeterminate cytology. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that molecular testing of thyroid nodules for a panel of mutations can be effectively performed in a clinical setting. It enhances the accuracy of FNA cytology and is of particular value for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.

CONTEXT: Cell lines derived from human cancers provide critical tools to study disease mechanisms and develop novel therapies. Recent reports indicate that up to 36% of cell lines are cross- contaminated. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated 40 reported thyroid cancer-derived cell lines using short tandem repeat and single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis. RESULTS: Only 23 of 40 cell lines tested have unique genetic profiles. The following groups of cell lines are likely derivatives of the same cell line: BHP5-16, BHP17-10, BHP14-9, and NPA87; BHP2-7, BHP10-3, BHP7-13, and TPC1; KAT5, KAT10, KAT4, KAT7, KAT50, KAK1, ARO81-1, and MRO87-1; and K1 and K2. The unique cell lines include BCPAP, KTC1, TT2609-C02, FTC133, ML1, WRO82-1, 8505C, SW1736, Cal-62, T235, T238, Uhth-104, ACT-1, HTh74, KAT18, TTA1, FRO81-2, HTh7, C643, BHT101, and KTC-2. The misidentified cell lines included the DRO90-1, which matched the melanoma-derived cell line, A-375. The ARO81-1 and its derivatives matched the HT-29 colon cancer cell line, and the NPA87 and its derivatives matched the M14/MDA-MB-435S melanoma cell line. TTF-1 and Pax-8 mRNA levels were determined in the unique cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: Many of these human cell lines have been widely used in the thyroid cancer field for the past 20 yr and are not only redundant, but not of thyroid origin. These results emphasize the importance of cell line integrity, and provide the short tandem repeat profiles for a panel of thyroid cancer cell lines that can be used as a reference for comparison of cell lines from other laboratories.

Increasingly, patients with thyroid nodule cytology labeled atypical (or follicular lesion) of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) or follicular neoplasm (FN) undergo diagnostic analysis with the Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC). No long-term, multisite analysis of Afirma GEC performance has yet been performed. We analyzed all patients who had received Afirma GEC testing at five academic medical centers between 2010 and 2013. Nodule and patient characteristics, fine needle aspiration cytology, Afirma GEC results, and subsequent clinical or surgical follow-up were obtained for 339 patients. Results were analyzed for pooled test performance, impact on clinical care, and site-to-site variation. Three hundred thirty-nine patients underwent Afirma GEC testing of cytologically indeterminate nodules (165 AUS/FLUS; 161 FN; 13 suspicious for malignancy) and 174 of 339 (51%) indeterminate nodules were GEC benign, whereas 148 GEC were suspicious (44%). GEC results significantly altered care recommendations, as 4 of 175 GEC benign were recommended for surgery in comparison to 141 of 149 GEC suspicious (P < .01). Of 121 Cyto Indeterminate/GEC Suspicious nodules surgically removed, 53 (44%) were malignant. Variability in site-to-site GEC performance was confirmed, as the proportion of GEC benign varied up to 29% (P = .58), whereas the malignancy rate in nodules cytologically indeterminate/GEC suspicious varied up to 47% (P = .11). Seventy-one of 174 GEC benign nodules had documented clinical follow-up for an average of 8.5 months, in which 1 of 71 nodules proved cancerous. These multicenter, clinical experience data confirm originally published Afirma GEC test performance and demonstrate its substantial impact on clinical care recommendations. Although nonsignificant site-to-site variation exists, such differences should be anticipated by the practicing clinician. Follow-up of GEC benign nodules thus far confirm the clinical utility of this diagnostic test.

CONTEXT: Ten to 30% of patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) develop recurrent disease and may benefit from innovative adjuvant therapies. Immune-based therapies are under investigation to treat many types of cancer. The role of the immune system in PTC is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether tumor-associated lymphocytes (TAL), in the absence of background thyroiditis (LT), contribute to disease severity. We hypothesized that the type of lymphocytes associated with PTC would correlate with parameters of disease. DESIGN: This retrospective study analyzed archived PTC samples for the presence of TAL and/or LT. A group of patients with TAL was evaluated for lymphocyte subsets by immunohistofluorescence. PATIENTS AND SETTING: One hundred PTC patients were analyzed for LT and TAL, and 10 PTC patients with TAL were assessed for lymphocyte subsets at University of Colorado Hospital. MAIN OUTCOME: We assessed correlations between disease and the presence of TAL, LT, and lymphocyte subset frequency. RESULTS: Patients with TAL exhibited higher disease stage and increased incidence of invasion and lymph node metastasis compared with patients without lymphocytes or with LT. CD4(+) T cell frequency correlated with tumor size (r = 0.742; P = 0.017). FoxP3(+) regulatory T cell (Treg) frequency correlated with lymph node metastases (r = 0.858; P = 0.002), and CD8 to Treg ratio correlated inversely with tumor size (r = -0.804; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: TAL and high Treg frequency in primary thyroid tumors correlates with more aggressive disease. Future prospective studies may identify Treg frequency as a predictive factor in PTC, and the suppressive effects of Treg should be considered in the design of immune-based therapies.

BACKGROUND: Seventy-five percent of thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology are found to be benign postoperatively. A novel genomic test, the Afirma gene expression classifier (AGEC), has been available for clinical use in the United States, since late 2010. In 2010, two modest-sized validation studies showed that the AGEC could identify a benign gene expression signature in indeterminate cytology thyroid FNA samples with a negative predictive value >95%. The objective of this study was to evaluate how the AGEC impacted the joint decision of the endocrinologist and patient to operate when FNA cytology was indeterminate, but the AGEC reading of the nodule was benign. METHODS: In this cross-sectional cohort study, data were contributed retrospectively by 51 endocrinologists at 21 practice sites that had previously obtained ≥3 benign AGEC readings in ≥1 cm nodules with indeterminate FNA cytology readings. Information regarding demographic data, nodule size and location, decision to operate, surgery type (hemithyroidectomy [HT] or total thyroidectomy [TT]), and reason for recommending surgery was retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Compared to a 74% previous historical rate of surgery for cytologically indeterminate nodules, the operative rate fell to 7.6% during the period that AGEC were obtained in the clinical practices, a highly significant reduction in the decision to operate (p<0.001). The rate of surgery on cytologically indeterminate nodules that were benign by the AGEC reading did not differ from the historically reported rate of operation on cytologically benign nodules (p=0.41). The four primary reasons reported by the physicians for operating on nodules with a benign AGEC reading, in descending order: large nodule size (46.4%), symptomatic nodules (25.0%), rapidly growing nodules (10.7%), or a second suspicious or malignant nodule in the same patient (10.7%). These reasons are concordant with those typically given for operation on cytologically benign nodules. CONCLUSIONS: In a substantial group of medical practices, obtaining an AGEC test in patients with cytologically indeterminate nodules was associated with a striking reduction in the rate of diagnostic thyroidectomy. Approximately, one surgery was avoided for every two AGEC tests run on thyroid FNAs with indeterminate cytology.