P

Philipp Kanis

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

ORCID: 0000-0003-4705-4447

Publishes on CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, RNA regulation and disease, Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques. 13 papers and 436 citations.

13Publications
436Total Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Simultaneous precise editing of multiple genes in human cells
Stephan Riesenberg, Manjusha Chintalapati, Dominik Macak et al.|Nucleic Acids Research|2019
Cited by 135Open Access

When double-strand breaks are introduced in a genome by CRISPR they are repaired either by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), which often results in insertions or deletions (indels), or by homology-directed repair (HDR), which allows precise nucleotide substitutions to be introduced if a donor oligonucleotide is provided. Because NHEJ is more efficient than HDR, the frequency with which precise genome editing can be achieved is so low that simultaneous editing of more than one gene has hitherto not been possible. Here, we introduced a mutation in the human PRKDC gene that eliminates the kinase activity of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs). This results in an increase in HDR irrespective of cell type and CRISPR enzyme used, sometimes allowing 87% of chromosomes in a population of cells to be precisely edited. It also allows for precise editing of up to four genes simultaneously (8 chromosomes) in the same cell. Transient inhibition of DNA-PKcs by the kinase inhibitor M3814 is similarly able to enhance precise genome editing.

Improved gRNA secondary structures allow editing of target sites resistant to CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage
Stephan Riesenberg, Nelly Helmbrecht, Philipp Kanis et al.|Nature Communications|2022
Cited by 100Open Access

The first step in CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing is the cleavage of target DNA sequences that are complementary to so-called spacer sequences in CRISPR guide RNAs (gRNAs). However, some DNA sequences are refractory to CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage, which is at least in part due to gRNA misfolding. To overcome this problem, we have engineered gRNAs with highly stable hairpins in their constant parts and further enhanced their stability by chemical modifications. The 'Genome-editing Optimized Locked Design' (GOLD)-gRNA increases genome editing efficiency up to around 1000-fold (from 0.08 to 80.5%) with a mean increase across different other targets of 7.4-fold. We anticipate that this improved gRNA will allow efficient editing regardless of spacer sequence composition and will be especially useful if a desired genomic site is difficult to edit.

Efficient high-precision homology-directed repair-dependent genome editing by HDRobust
Stephan Riesenberg, Philipp Kanis, Dominik Macak et al.|Nature Methods|2023
Cited by 78Open Access

Homology-directed repair (HDR), a method for repair of DNA double-stranded breaks can be leveraged for the precise introduction of mutations supplied by synthetic DNA donors, but remains limited by low efficiency and off-target effects. In this study, we report HDRobust, a high-precision method that, via the combined transient inhibition of nonhomologous end joining and microhomology-mediated end joining, resulted in the induction of point mutations by HDR in up to 93% (median 60%, s.e.m. 3) of chromosomes in populations of cells. We found that, using this method, insertions, deletions and rearrangements at the target site, as well as unintended changes at other genomic sites, were largely abolished. We validated this approach for 58 different target sites and showed that it allows efficient correction of pathogenic mutations in cells derived from patients suffering from anemia, sickle cell disease and thrombophilia.

Longer metaphase and fewer chromosome segregation errors in modern human than Neanderthal brain development
Felipe Mora‐Bermúdez, Philipp Kanis, Dominik Macak et al.|Science Advances|2022
Cited by 53Open Access

Since the ancestors of modern humans separated from those of Neanderthals, around 100 amino acid substitutions spread to essentially all modern humans. The biological significance of these changes is largely unknown. Here, we examine all six such amino acid substitutions in three proteins known to have key roles in kinetochore function and chromosome segregation and to be highly expressed in the stem cells of the developing neocortex. When we introduce these modern human-specific substitutions in mice, three substitutions in two of these proteins, KIF18a and KNL1, cause metaphase prolongation and fewer chromosome segregation errors in apical progenitors of the developing neocortex. Conversely, the ancestral substitutions cause shorter metaphase length and more chromosome segregation errors in human brain organoids, similar to what we find in chimpanzee organoids. These results imply that the fidelity of chromosome segregation during neocortex development improved in modern humans after their divergence from Neanderthals.

Comment on “Reintroduction of the archaic variant of <i>NOVA1</i> in cortical organoids alters neurodevelopment”
Cited by 29

. (Research Articles, 12 February 2021, eaax2537) conclude that the reintroduction of an ancestral amino acid substitution in the protein NOVA1 drastically alters the development of brain organoids. We show that cell lines used by the authors carry heterozygous deletions of the target DNA sequence, providing another plausible explanation for the effects observed.