Luoying Jiang

Gene therapy focuses on genetic modification to produce therapeutic effects or treat diseases by repairing or reconstructing genetic material, thus being expected to be the most promising therapeutic strategy for genetic disorders. Due to the growing attention to hearing impairment, an increasing amount of research is attempting to utilize gene therapy for hereditary hearing loss (HHL), an important monogenic disease and the most common type of congenital deafness. Several gene therapy clinical trials for HHL have recently been approved, and, additionally, CRISPR-Cas tools have been attempted for HHL treatment. Therefore, in order to further advance the development of inner ear gene therapy and promote its broad application in other forms of genetic disease, it is imperative to review the progress of gene therapy for HHL. Herein, we address three main gene therapy strategies (gene replacement, gene suppression, and gene editing), summarizing the strategy that is most appropriate for particular monogenic diseases based on different pathogenic mechanisms, and then focusing on their successful applications for HHL in preclinical trials. Finally, we elaborate on the challenges and outlooks of gene therapy for HHL. Gene therapy focuses on genetic modification to produce therapeutic effects or treat diseases by repairing or reconstructing genetic material, thus being expected to be the most promising therapeutic strategy for genetic disorders. Due to the growing attention to hearing impairment, an increasing amount of research is attempting to utilize gene therapy for hereditary hearing loss (HHL), an important monogenic disease and the most common type of congenital deafness. Several gene therapy clinical trials for HHL have recently been approved, and, additionally, CRISPR-Cas tools have been attempted for HHL treatment. Therefore, in order to further advance the development of inner ear gene therapy and promote its broad application in other forms of genetic disease, it is imperative to review the progress of gene therapy for HHL. Herein, we address three main gene therapy strategies (gene replacement, gene suppression, and gene editing), summarizing the strategy that is most appropriate for particular monogenic diseases based on different pathogenic mechanisms, and then focusing on their successful applications for HHL in preclinical trials. Finally, we elaborate on the challenges and outlooks of gene therapy for HHL.

Gene therapy is a promising approach for hereditary deafness. We recently showed that unilateral AAV1-hOTOF gene therapy with dual adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 1 carrying human OTOF transgene is safe and associated with functional improvements in patients with autosomal recessive deafness 9 (DFNB9). The protocol was subsequently amended and approved to allow bilateral gene therapy administration. Here we report an interim analysis of the single-arm trial investigating the safety and efficacy of binaural therapy in five pediatric patients with DFNB9. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity at 6 weeks, and the secondary endpoint included safety (adverse events) and efficacy (auditory function and speech perception). No dose-limiting toxicity or serious adverse event occurred. A total of 36 adverse events occurred. The most common adverse events were increased lymphocyte counts (6 out of 36) and increased cholesterol levels (6 out of 36). All patients had bilateral hearing restoration. The average auditory brainstem response threshold in the right (left) ear was >95 dB (>95 dB) in all patients at baseline, and the average auditory brainstem response threshold in the right (left) ear was restored to 58 dB (58 dB) in patient 1, 75 dB (85 dB) in patient 2, 55 dB (50 dB) in patient 3 at 26 weeks, and 75 dB (78 dB) in patient 4 and 63 dB (63 dB) in patient 5 at 13 weeks. The speech perception and the capability of sound source localization were restored in all five patients. These results provide preliminary insights on the safety and efficacy of binaural AAV gene therapy for hereditary deafness. The trial is ongoing with longer follow-up to confirm the safety and efficacy findings. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry registration: ChiCTR2200063181 .

Importance: OTOF gene therapy (GT) has been shown to improve hearing and speech. The efficacy of GT remains to be compared against cochlear implantation (CI), the current gold standard for congenital deafness. Objective: To evaluate treatment outcomes in auditory and speech perception between patients with congenital deafness treated with GT, CI, or both. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonblind cohort study was conducted between December 2022 and November 2024. GT patients received follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months; CI patients received 1-time evaluation at the corresponding time intervals or longer (3, 6, or 12 months). The study was conducted at a single class A tertiary hospital in China. Participants with congenital severe to complete hearing loss, aged 1 to 18 years, who received GT or CI were enrolled. They were matched on duration of deafness, hearing thresholds, and speech ability at the presurgical baseline. Of 1568 participants screened, 72 participants enrolled. Participants were excluded if they had inner ear malformations or vestibular-cochlear nerve abnormalities. Exposures: GT only vs CI; bimodal (unilateral GT plus contralateral CI) vs bilateral CI; GT (CI turned off [CI-off]) vs unilateral CI. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were auditory and speech perception evaluated by questionnaires, including the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale/Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS/MAIS), and tests, including audiometry, speech, and music tests. The main secondary outcome was auditory information processing ability assessed by mismatch negativity (MMN). Results: A total of 11 GT patients (6 male [55%]; mean [SD] age at baseline, 3.7 [2.8] years) and 61 CI patients (34 male [56%]; mean [SD] age at baseline, 1.9 [1.5] years) were enrolled. The mean (SD) auditory brainstem response thresholds were restored from greater than 95.0 (0.0) decibels normalized hearing level (dB nHL) to 54.8 (15.9) dB nHL in 9 GT patients at 12 months. For GT-only vs CI in auditory and speech perception, GT patients performed better in IT-MAIS/MAIS at 6 months (median [IQR] score, 31.0 [30.0-32.0] vs 23.5 [19.0-26.3]; P = .01) and 12 months (median [IQR] score, 32.0 [31.0-32.0] vs 28.0 [24.5-30.5]; P = .007). GT patients showed shorter latencies of MMN at 6 months (median [IQR], 0.20 [0.05-0.21] seconds vs 0.23 [0.22-0.25] seconds; P = .006). For bimodal patients at 12 months, GT (CI-off) patients performed better than unilateral CI patients in speech in a noisy environment (median [IQR] disyllable, -1.0 [-3.0 to 2.4] dB sound pressure level (SPL) vs 5.3 [3.1 to 12.1] dB SPL; P = .03); GT plus CI patients performed better than bilateral CI patients in singing in-tune rates (median [IQR], 66.6% [53.7%-83.9%] vs 37.1% [30.3%-56.3%]; P = .04); GT plus CI patients showed shorter latencies of MMN at 12 months (median [IQR], 0.08 [0.07-0.10] seconds vs 0.21 [0.15-0.23] seconds, P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: GT patients showed stable hearing recovery and exhibited more rapid improvements in auditory and speech performance than CI patients, while outperforming CI patients in speech in noise performance and music perception. These findings suggest that GT may provide a novel effective treatment alternative for patients with genetically driven congenital deafness.

Vestibular hair cells are mechanosensory receptors that are capable of detecting changes in head position and thereby allow animals to maintain their posture and coordinate their movement. Vestibular hair cells are susceptible to ototoxic drugs, aging, and genetic factors that can lead to permanent vestibular dysfunction. Vestibular dysfunction mainly results from the injury of hair cells, which are located in the vestibular sensory epithelium. This review summarizes the mechanisms of different factors causing vestibular hair cell damage and therapeutic strategies to protect vestibular hair cells.