Centre Hospitalier privé Saint Grégoire
Publishes on Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research, Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques. 70 papers and 3.9k citations.
Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.
4007 Background: PRODIGE 23 investigated the role of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX before preoperative (preop) chemoradiation (CRT), with TME-surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in resectable locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: PRODIGE 23 is a phase III multicenter randomized clinical trial. Eligible pts had cT3 or cT4, M0 rectal adenocarcinomas <15 cm from the anal verge, age 18-75 years, and WHO PS ≤1. Randomization was stratified by center, T stage, N status, tumor location, and perirectal fat extramural extension. Primary endpoint was 3-yr disease-free survival (DFS). Main secondary endpoints were ypT0N0 rate, overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS). 460 pts were required to observe 136 events to show a gain in 3-year DFS from 75% to 85% (HR=0.56) with a 2-sided α=0.05 and 90% power. HR and 95% CI were estimated by a stratified Cox proportional hazard model. Arm A pts received preop CRT (50 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction [fr]; 25 fr + capecitabine), surgery, then adjuvant CT for 6 months (mos). Arm B pts received 6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², irinotecan 180 mg/m² D1, and 5-FU 2.4 g/m² over 46 h) every 14 days, followed by the same preop CRT, surgery and 3 mos of adjuvant CT. Adjuvant CT consisted of mFOLFOX6 or capecitabine, depending on the centre’s choice for all pts. Imaging work-up, operative and pathology reports were centrally reviewed. Results: (ITT) Between 6/2012 and 6/2017, 230 and 231 pts were randomly assigned in Arm A/B, respectively by 35 participating centers. Pts characteristics were well balanced. Neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX and CRT in both arms were well tolerated. Compliance to CRT and to adjuvant CT was not hampered by neoadjuvant CT. Surgical morbidity did not differ between the 2 arms. The ypT0N0 rate was 11.7 vs 27.5% in Arm A/B (p<0.001). Median follow-up was 46.5 mos. 136 DFS events was reported. 3-yr DFS was significantly increased in arm B (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97, p=0.034): 68.5% (CI: 61.9-74.2) vs 75.7% (CI: 69.4-80.8) in arm A/B. The subgroup analysis showed no evidence of heterogeneity of the effect size of treatment on DFS. 3-yr MFS was also significantly higher in arm B: 71.7 in arm A vs 78.8% (HR 0.64, CI 0.44-0.93, p<0.02) in arm B. 3-yr OS was 87.7 vs 90.8% (HR 0.65, CI 0.40-1.05, p=0.077) in arm A/B, with 54.2% of the pts with recurrence being alive. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX plus CRT is safe, and significantly increased ypCR rate, DFS and MFS. OS data are not mature. Clinical trial information: NCT01804790 .
LBA3504 Background: We have reported that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with FOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) significantly improved outcomes in patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared with pts who received standard CRT, surgery, and ACT. We now report the primary and secondary endpoints with mature follow-up (F/U). Methods: PRODIGE 23 is a phase III randomized clinical trial. Eligible pts had cT3 or cT4, M0 rectal adenocarcinomas <15 cm from the anal verge, age 18-75 years, and WHO PS ≤1. Randomization was stratified by center, T stage, N status, T location, and T extramural spread. Arm A pts received preoperative CRT (50 Gy, 2 Gy/fr; 25 fr + capecitabine), surgery, then ACT for 6 months (mos). Arm B pts received 6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX, then the same preoperative CRT, surgery and 3 mos of ACT, mFOLFOX6 or capecitabine. From 6/2012 to 6/2017, pts were randomly assigned in Arm A (n=230) and B (n=231) by 35 participating centers. Analysis was performed on intent-to-treat population. For survival outcomes, HR and 95% CI were estimated by a stratified Cox proportional hazard (PH) model. However, we observed non-PH. So we used the restricted mean survival time (RMST) to evaluate the treatment effect (Liang F & al Ann Oncol 2018, Pak K & al JAMA Oncol 2017). Results: With a median F/U of 82.2 mos, death was reported for 55 pts in arm A and 42 in Arm B. All survival endpoints were better for Arm B vs Arm A. The absolute increase in 5-year survival were 7.6% for Disease-Free Survival (DFS), 6.9% for Overall Survival (OS), 9.9% for Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS), and 5.7% for Cancer Specific Survival (CSS) in Arm B compared to Arm A. Survival results at 7 years are presented in the Table. 7-year cumulative incidence of locoregional relapses are 5.3% in arm B vs 8.1% in arm A (p= 0.38). Conclusions: NACT with mFOLFIRINOX followed by CRT, surgery, and ACT significantly improved all outcomes, including OS in pts with LARC vs those who received standard CRT, surgery, and ACT. Clinical trial information: NCT01804790 . [Table: see text]