S

Sandra Westphal

University of Mary

Publishes on Immunotherapy and Immune Responses, CAR-T cell therapy research, Law and Political Science. 34 papers and 1.8k citations.

34Publications
1.8kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Molecular characterization and allergenic activity of Lyc e 2 (β‐fructofuranosidase), a glycosylated allergen of tomato
Sandra Westphal, Daniel Kolarich, Kay Foetisch et al.|European Journal of Biochemistry|2003
Cited by 113Open Access

Until now, only a small amount of information is available about tomato allergens. In the present study, a glycosylated allergen of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), Lyc e 2, was purified from tomato extract by a two-step FPLC method. The cDNA of two different isoforms of the protein, Lyc e 2.01 and Lyc e 2.02, was cloned into the bacterial expression vector pET100D. The recombinant proteins were purified by electroelution and refolded. The IgE reactivity of both the recombinant and the natural proteins was investigated with sera of patients with adverse reactions to tomato. IgE-binding to natural Lyc e 2 was completely inhibited by the pineapple stem bromelain glycopeptide MUXF (Man alpha 1-6(Xyl beta 1-2)Man beta 1-4GlcNAc beta 1-4(Fuc alpha 1-3)GlcNAc). Accordingly, the nonglycosylated recombinant protein isoforms did not bind IgE of tomato allergic patients. Hence, we concluded that the IgE reactivity of the natural protein mainly depends on the glycan structure. The amino acid sequences of both isoforms of the allergen contain four possible N-glycosylation sites. By application of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry the predominant glycan structure of the natural allergen was identified as MMXF (Man alpha 1-6(Man alpha 1-3)(Xyl beta 1-2)Man beta 1-4GlcNAc beta 1-4(Fuc alpha 1-3) GlcNAc). Natural Lyc e 2, but not the recombinant protein was able to trigger histamine release from passively sensitized basophils of patients with IgE to carbohydrate determinants, demonstrating that glycan structures can be important for the biological activity of allergens.

Tomato profilin Lyc e 1: IgE cross‐reactivity and allergenic potency
Sandra Westphal, W. Kempf, Kay Foetisch et al.|Allergy|2004
Cited by 90

BACKGROUND: To date, very little data are available about the nature of tomato allergens. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) cross-reactive profilins have been suggested to account for allergic symptoms in patients suffering from tomato allergy. METHODS: The cDNA of tomato profilin was amplified by reversely transcribed polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from total RNA extracted from ripe tomato fruit. The gene was cloned into the pET101D expression plasmid and the protein was produced in Escherichia coli BL21. Purification was performed via poly-l-proline (PLP) affinity chromatography. IgE reactivity of recombinant tomato profilin was investigated by immunoblot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. IgE-inhibition studies were performed to analyse cross-reactivity with other profilins. To determine the allergenic activity of the recombinant protein, basophil histamine release assays using sera of patients with adverse reactions to tomato were performed. RESULTS: Profilin was identified as a new minor allergen in tomato fruits. The recombinant tomato profilin comprises 131 amino acids and high sequence identity to other allergenic food and pollen profilins. It was shown to be IgE-reactive with a prevalence of 22% (11/50) in tomato-allergic patients. In patients with tomato allergy and multiple sensitization to other foods and birch pollen, IgE directed against tomato profilin showed a strong cross-reactivity with profilins from plant food sources and birch pollen. The tomato profilin was able to induce mediator release from human basophils. CONCLUSION: The tomato profilin is a minor allergen in tomato fruit. Thus, it shows biological activity, as confirmed by in vitro histamine release assays with human basophils and thereby has the potential to account for clinical symptoms in tomato-allergic patients.