J. Lee

Body mass index (BMI) and mortality in old adults from the general population have been related in a U-shaped or J-shaped curve. However, limited information is available for elderly nursing home populations, particularly about specific cause of death. A systematic PubMed/EMBASE/CINAHL/SCOPUS search until 31 May 2014 without language restrictions was conducted. As no published study reported mortality in standard BMI groups (<18.5, 18.5-24.9, 25-29.9, ≥30 kg/m(2)), the most adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) according to a pre-defined list of covariates were obtained from authors and pooled by random-effect model across each BMI category. Out of 342 hits, 20 studies including 19,538 older nursing home residents with 5,223 deaths during a median of 2 years of follow-up were meta-analysed. Compared with normal weight, all-cause mortality HRs were 1.41 (95% CI = 1.26-1.58) for underweight, 0.85 (95% CI = 0.73-0.99) for overweight and 0.74 (95% CI = 0.57-0.96) for obesity. Underweight was a risk factor for higher mortality caused by infections (HR = 1.65 [95% CI = 1.13-2.40]). RR results corroborated primary HR results, with additionally lower infection-related mortality in overweight and obese than in normal-weight individuals. Like in the general population, underweight is a risk factor for mortality in old nursing home residents. However, uniquely, not only overweight but also obesity is protective, which has relevant nutritional goal implications in this population/setting.

BACKGROUND: One of the key clinical features of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is impairment in daily functioning. Patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) also commonly have mild problems performing complex tasks. Information and communication technology (ICT), particularly techniques involving imaging and video processing, is of interest in order to improve assessment. The overall aim of this study is to demonstrate that it is possible using a video monitoring system to obtain a quantifiable assessment of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) in AD and in MCI. METHODS: The aim of the study is to propose a daily activity scenario (DAS) score that detects functional impairment using ICTs in AD and MCI compared with normal control group (NC). Sixty-four participants over 65 years old were included: 16 AD matched with 10 NC for protocol 1 (P1) and 19 MCI matched with 19 NC for protocol 2 (P2). Each participant was asked to undertake a set of daily tasks in the setting of a "smart home" equipped with two video cameras and everyday objects for use in activities of daily living (8 IADLs for P1 and 11 for P2, plus 4 temporal execution constraints). The DAS score was then computed from quantitative and qualitative parameters collected from video recordings. RESULTS: In P1, the DAS score differentiated AD (DAS(AD,P1) = 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.56) from NC (DAS(NC,P1) = 0.71, 95% CI 0.68-0.74). In P2, the DAS score differentiated MCI (DAS(MCI,P2) = 0.11, 95% CI 0.05-0.16) and NC (DAS(NC,P2) = 0.36, 95% CI 0.26-0.45). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study outlines the interest of a novel tool coming from the ICT world for the assessment of functional impairment in AD and MCI. The derived DAS scores provide a pragmatic, ecological, objective measurement which may improve the prediction of future dementia, be used as an outcome measurement in clinical trials and lead to earlier therapeutic intervention.

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) in the neck. Materials and Methods: 176 neck lesions (40 thy roid, 56 lymph nodes, 46 salivary, 34 miscella neous) identified in a routine US clinic underwent SWE by one or two blinded radiologists. For this study, SWE required the operator to acquire three 10 second dynamic colour-coded SWE cineloops per lesion, select one static image per cineloop, and place circular regions-of-interest within the entire lesion and stiffest part to generate 3 SWE measurements per static image. For logistical rea sons, one radiologist evaluated all 176 lesions and the other evaluated 58 lesions. Both radiologists also reviewed 27 archived cineloops independ ently to assess SWE excluding practical technique. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correla tion coefficients (ICCs) concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and coefficients of repeatabil ity (CORs). Results: Test-retest ICCs for the radiologist evalu ating 176 lesions were 0.78–0.85 (fair-excellent agreement), CCCs were 0.85–0.88 (substantial agreement), and CORs were 14.9–36.1 kPa. For both radiologists evaluating 58 lesions, intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs were 0.65–0.78 and 0.72–0.77 respectively. For SWE excluding practical technique, inter-rater ICCs were 0.97–0.98 (ex cellent agreement). ICCs differed according to tis sue, being higher in thyroid lesions than lymph nodes (p &lt; 0.001), and higher in benign than ma lignant lesions (p values &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Intra- and inter-rater reliability of SWE is fair to excellent according to ICCs. SWE re liability is influenced appreciably by acquisition technique. Nevertheless, CORs for SWE are not negligible. To determine whether these results are acceptable clinically, further research is re quired to establish SWE stiffness values of normal and pathological tissues in the neck.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability of shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) in the neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 176 neck lesions (40 thyroid, 56 lymph nodes, 46 salivary, 34 miscellaneous) identified in a routine US clinic underwent SWE by one or two blinded radiologists. For this study, SWE required the operator to acquire three 10 second dynamic colour-coded SWE cineloops per lesion, select one static image per cineloop, and place circular regions-of-interest within the entire lesion and stiffest part to generate 3 SWE measurements per static image. For logistical reasons, one radiologist evaluated all 176 lesions and the other evaluated 58 lesions. Both radiologists also reviewed 27 archived cineloops independently to assess SWE excluding practical technique. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and coefficients of repeatability (CORs). RESULTS: Test-retest ICCs for the radiologist evaluating 176 lesions were 0.78 - 0.85 (fair-excellent agreement), CCCs were 0.85 - 0.88 (substantial agreement), and CORs were 14.9 - 36.1 kPa. For both radiologists evaluating 58 lesions, intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs were 0.65 - 0.78 and 0.72 - 0.77 respectively. For SWE excluding practical technique, inter-rater ICCs were 0.97 - 0.98 (excellent agreement). ICCs differed according to tissue, being higher in thyroid lesions than lymph nodes (p < 0.001), and higher in benign than malignant lesions (p values < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intra- and inter-rater reliability of SWE is fair to excellent according to ICCs. SWE reliability is influenced appreciably by acquisition technique. Nevertheless, CORs for SWE are not negligible. To determine whether these results are acceptable clinically, further research is required to establish SWE stiffness values of normal and pathological tissues in the neck.