Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-EwHans W. Horn, William C. Swope, Jed W. Pitera et al.|The Journal of Chemical Physics|2004 A re-parameterization of the standard TIP4P water model for use with Ewald techniques is introduced, providing an overall global improvement in water properties relative to several popular nonpolarizable and polarizable water potentials. Using high precision simulations, and careful application of standard analytical corrections, we show that the new TIP4P-Ew potential has a density maximum at approximately 1 degrees C, and reproduces experimental bulk-densities and the enthalpy of vaporization, DeltaH(vap), from -37.5 to 127 degrees C at 1 atm with an absolute average error of less than 1%. Structural properties are in very good agreement with x-ray scattering intensities at temperatures between 0 and 77 degrees C and dynamical properties such as self-diffusion coefficient are in excellent agreement with experiment. The parameterization approach used can be easily generalized to rehabilitate any water force field using available experimental data over a range of thermodynamic points.
X-ray solution scattering (SAXS) combined with crystallography and computation: defining accurate macromolecular structures, conformations and assemblies in solutionChristopher D. Putnam, Michal Hammel, Greg L. Hura et al.|Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics|2007 Crystallography supplies unparalleled detail on structural information critical for mechanistic analyses; however, it is restricted to describing low energy conformations of macromolecules within crystal lattices. Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) offers complementary information about macromolecular folding, unfolding, aggregation, extended conformations, flexibly linked domains, shape, conformation, and assembly state in solution, albeit at the lower resolution range of about 50 A to 10 A resolution, but without the size limitations inherent in NMR and electron microscopy studies. Together these techniques can allow multi-scale modeling to create complete and accurate images of macromolecules for modeling allosteric mechanisms, supramolecular complexes, and dynamic molecular machines acting in diverse processes ranging from eukaryotic DNA replication, recombination and repair to microbial membrane secretion and assembly systems. This review addresses both theoretical and practical concepts, concerns and considerations for using these techniques in conjunction with computational methods to productively combine solution scattering data with high-resolution structures. Detailed aspects of SAXS experimental results are considered with a focus on data interpretation tools suitable to model protein and nucleic acid macromolecular structures, including membrane protein, RNA, DNA, and protein-nucleic acid complexes. The methods discussed provide the basis to examine molecular interactions in solution and to study macromolecular flexibility and conformational changes that have become increasingly relevant for accurate understanding, simulation, and prediction of mechanisms in structural cell biology and nanotechnology.
Water Structure from Scattering Experiments and SimulationNo abstract prepared.
Structure and flexibility within proteins as identified through small angle X-ray scatteringMartin Pelikán, Greg L. Hura, Michal Hammel|General Physiology and Biophysics|2009 Flexibility between domains of proteins is often critical for function. These motions and proteins with large scale flexibility in general are often not readily amenable to conventional structural analysis such as X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) or electron microscopy. A common evolution of a crystallography project, once a high resolution structure has been determined, is to postulate possible sights of flexibility. Here we describe an analysis tool using relatively inexpensive small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements to identify flexibility and validate a constructed minimal ensemble of models, which represent highly populated conformations in solution. The resolution of these results is sufficient to address the questions being asked: what kinds of conformations do the domains sample in solution? In our rigid body modeling strategy BILBOMD, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are used to explore conformational space. A common strategy is to perform the MD simulation on the domains connections at very high temperature, where the additional kinetic energy prevents the molecule from becoming trapped in a local minimum. The MD simulations provide an ensemble of molecular models from which a SAXS curve is calculated and compared to the experimental curve. A genetic algorithm is used to identify the minimal ensemble (minimal ensemble search, MES) required to best fit the experimental data. We demonstrate the use of MES in several model and in four experimental examples.
What can x-ray scattering tell us about the radial distribution functions of water?Jon M. Sorenson, Greg L. Hura, Robert M. Glaeser et al.|The Journal of Chemical Physics|2000 We present an analysis of the Advanced Light Source (ALS) x-ray scattering experiment on pure liquid water at ambient temperature and pressure described in the preceding article. The present study discusses the extraction of radial distribution functions from the x-ray scattering of molecular fluids. It is proposed that the atomic scattering factors used to model water be modified to include the changes in the intramolecular electron distribution caused by chemical bonding effects. Based on this analysis we present a gOO(r) for water consistent with our recent experimental data gathered at the ALS, which differs in some aspects from the gOO(r) reported by other x-ray and neutron scattering experiments. Our gOO(r) exhibits a taller and sharper first peak, and systematic shifts in all peak positions to smaller r. Based on experimental uncertainties, we discuss what features of gOO(r) should be reproduced by classical simulations of nonpolarizable and polarizable water models, as well as ab initio simulations of water, at ambient conditions. We directly compare many water models and simulations to the present data, and discuss possible improvements in both classical and ab initio simulation approaches in the future.