Marine Giry

Abstract Purpose: Oncogenic fusions consisting of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and TACC are present in a subgroup of glioblastoma (GBM) and other human cancers and have been proposed as new therapeutic targets. We analyzed frequency and molecular features of FGFR–TACC fusions and explored the therapeutic efficacy of inhibiting FGFR kinase in GBM and grade II and III glioma. Experimental Design: Overall, 795 gliomas (584 GBM, 85 grades II and III with wild-type and 126 with IDH1/2 mutation) were screened for FGFR–TACC breakpoints and associated molecular profile. We also analyzed expression of the FGFR3 and TACC3 components of the fusions. The effects of the specific FGFR inhibitor JNJ-42756493 for FGFR3–TACC3–positive glioma were determined in preclinical experiments. Two patients with advanced FGFR3–TACC3–positive GBM received JNJ-42756493 and were assessed for therapeutic response. Results: Three of 85 IDH1/2 wild-type (3.5%) but none of 126 IDH1/2-mutant grade II and III gliomas harbored FGFR3–TACC3 fusions. FGFR–TACC rearrangements were present in 17 of 584 GBM (2.9%). FGFR3–TACC3 fusions were associated with strong and homogeneous FGFR3 immunostaining. They are mutually exclusive with IDH1/2 mutations and EGFR amplification, whereas they co-occur with CDK4 amplification. JNJ-42756493 inhibited growth of glioma cells harboring FGFR3–TACC3 in vitro and in vivo. The two patients with FGFR3–TACC3 rearrangements who received JNJ-42756493 manifested clinical improvement with stable disease and minor response, respectively. Conclusions: RT-PCR sequencing is a sensitive and specific method to identify FGFR–TACC–positive patients. FGFR3–TACC3 fusions are associated with uniform intratumor expression of the fusion protein. The clinical response observed in the FGFR3–TACC3–positive patients treated with an FGFR inhibitor supports clinical studies of FGFR inhibition in FGFR–TACC–positive patients. Clin Cancer Res; 21(14); 3307–17. ©2015 AACR. See related commentary by Ahluwalia and Rich, p. 3105

BACKGROUND: The role of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) in gliomagenesis has been recently further strengthened by the frequent occurrence of TERT promoter mutations (TERTp-mut) in gliomas and evidence that the TERT SNP genetic rs2736100 influences glioma risk. TERTp-mut creates a binding site for Ets/TCF transcription factors, whereas the common rs2853669 polymorphism disrupts another Ets/TCF site on TERT promoter. METHODS: We sequenced for TERTp-mut in 807 glioma DNAs and in 235 blood DNAs and analysed TERT expression by RT-PCR in 151 samples. TERTp-mut status and TERTp polymorphism rs2853669 were correlated with histology, genomic profile, TERT mRNA expression, clinical outcome and rs2736100 genotype. RESULTS: TERTp-mut identified in 60.8% of gliomas (491 out of 807) was globally associated with poorer outcome (Hazard ratio (HR)=1.50). We defined, based on TERTp-mut and IDH mutation status, four prognostic groups: (1) TERTp-mut and IDH-mut associated with 1p19q codeletion, overall survival (OS)>17 years; (2) TERTp-wt and IDH-mut, associated with TP53 mutation, OS=97.5 months; (3) TERTp-wt and IDH-wt, with no specific association, OS=31.6 months; (4) TERTp-mut and IDH-wt, associated with EGFR amplification, OS=15.4 months. TERTp-mut was associated with higher TERT mRNA expression, whereas the rs2853669 variant was associated with lower TERT mRNA expression. The mutation of CIC (a repressor of ETV1-5 belonging to the Ets/TCF family) was also associated with TERT mRNA upregulation. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to IDH mutation status, defining the TERTp-mut status of glial tumours should afford enhanced prognostic stratification of patients with glioma. We also show that TERTp-mut, rs2853669 variant and CIC mutation influence Tert expression. This effect could be mediated by Ets/TCF transcription factors.

Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is an intracellular enzyme whose physiologic function is the decarboxylation of glutamate to gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the main inhibitory neurotransmitter within the central nervous system. GAD antibodies (Ab) have been associated with multiple neurological syndromes, including stiff-person syndrome, cerebellar ataxia, and limbic encephalitis, which are all considered to result from reduced GABAergic transmission. The pathogenic role of GAD Ab is still debated, and some evidence suggests that GAD autoimmunity might primarily be cell-mediated. Diagnosis relies on the detection of high titers of GAD Ab in serum and/or in the detection of GAD Ab in the cerebrospinal fluid. Due to the relative rarity of these syndromes, treatment schemes and predictors of response are poorly defined, highlighting the unmet need for multicentric prospective trials in this population. Here, we reviewed the main clinical characteristics of neurological syndromes associated with GAD Ab, focusing on pathophysiologic mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype (wt) grade II gliomas are a rare and heterogeneous entity. Survival and prognostic factors are poorly defined. METHODS: We searched retrospectively all patients diagnosed with diffuse World Health Organization (WHO) grades II and III gliomas at our center (1989-2020). RESULTS: Out of 517 grade II gliomas, 47 were "diffuse astrocytomas, IDHwt." Tumors frequently had fronto-temporo-insular location (28/47, 60%) and infiltrative behavior. We found telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations (23/45, 51%), whole chromosome 7 gains (10/37, 27%), whole chromosome 10 losses (10/41, 24%), and EGFR amplifications (4/43, 9%), but no TP53 mutations (0/22, 0%). Median overall survival (OS) was 59 months (vs 19 mo for IDHwt grade III gliomas) (P < 0.0001). Twenty-nine patients (29/43, 67%) met the definition of molecular glioblastoma according to cIMPACT-NOW update 3. Median OS in this subset was 42 months, which was shorter compared with patients with IDHwt grade II gliomas not meeting this definition (median OS: 57 mo), but substantially longer compared with IDHwt grade III gliomas meeting the definition for molecular glioblastoma (median OS: 17 mo, P < 0.0001). Most patients with IDHwt grade II gliomas met cIMPACT criteria because of isolated TERT promoter mutations (16/26, 62%), which were not predictive of poor outcome (median OS: 88 mo). Actionable targets, including 5 gene fusions involving FGFR3, were found in 7 patients (24%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the importance of histological grading and molecular profiling for the prognostic stratification of IDHwt gliomas and suggest some caution when assimilating IDHwt grade II gliomas to molecular glioblastomas, especially those with isolated TERT promoter mutation.