Ulrich Beyer

Purpose Treating solid tumors with cancer immunotherapy (CIT) can result in unconventional responses and overall survival (OS) benefits that are not adequately captured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. We describe immune-modified RECIST (imRECIST) criteria, designed to better capture CIT responses. Patients and Methods Atezolizumab data from clinical trials in non-small-cell lung cancer, metastatic urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma were evaluated. Modifications to imRECIST versus RECIST v1.1 included allowance for best overall response after progressive disease (PD) and changes in PD definitions per new lesions (NLs) and nontarget lesions. imRECIST progression-free survival (PFS) did not count initial PD as an event if the subsequent scan showed disease control. OS was evaluated using conditional landmarks in patients whose PFS differed by imRECIST versus RECIST v1.1. Results The best overall response was 1% to 2% greater, the disease control rate was 8% to 13% greater, and the median PFS was 0.5 to 1.5 months longer per imRECIST versus RECIST v1.1. Extension of imRECIST PFS versus RECIST v1.1 PFS was associated with longer or similar OS. Patterns of progression analysis revealed that patients who developed NLs without target lesion (TL) progression had a similar or shorter OS compared with patients with RECIST v1.1 TL progression. Patients infrequently experienced a spike pattern (TLs increase, then decrease) but had longer OS than patients without TL reversion. Conclusion Evaluation of PFS and patterns of response and progression revealed that allowance for TL reversion from PD per imRECIST may better identify patients with OS benefit. Progression defined by the isolated appearance of NLs, however, is not associated with longer OS. These results may inform additional modifications to radiographic criteria (including imRECIST) to better reflect efficacy with CIT agents.

Among several drug delivery systems, liposomal encapsulated anti-cancer agents represent an advanced and versatile technology. Several formulations of liposomal anthracyclines are approved, e.g. for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (pegylated and non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) or AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and liposomal daunorubicin). Meanwhile, virtually all anti-cancer drugs have been encapsulated in liposomes using different technologies. This review will summarize preclinical and clinical data of approved and exemplary emerging liposomal anti-cancer agents.

Drug-polymer conjugates are potential candidates for the selective delivery of anticancer agents to tumor tissue. Incorporating acid-sensitive bonds between the drug and the polymer is an attractive approach because it ensures effective release of the polymer-bound drug at the tumor site. This release is either extracellular, resulting from the slightly acidic pH in tumor tissue, or intracellular, in acidic endosomes or lysosomes after cellular uptake of the drug-polymer conjugate. This paper reviews acid-sensitive drug-polymer conjugates developed during the past 20 years and outlines aspects for further development in this research field.

One strategy for improving the antitumor selectivity and toxicity profile of antitumor agents is to design drug carrier systems employing suitable carrier proteins. Thus, thiolated human serum transferrin was conjugated with four maleimide derivatives of doxorubicin that differed in the stability of the chemical link between drug and spacer. Of the maleimide derivatives, 3-maleimidobenzoic or 4-maleimidophenylacetic acid was bound to the 3'-amino position of doxorubicin through a benzoyl or phenylacetyl amide bond, and 3-maleimidobenzoic acid hydrazide or 4-maleimidophenylacetic acid hydrazide was bound to the 13-keto position through a benzoyl hydrazone or phenylacetyl hydrazone bond. The acid-sensitive transferrin conjugates prepared with the carboxylic hydrazone doxorubicin derivatives exhibited an inhibitory efficacy in the MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cell line and U937 leukemia cell line comparable to that of the free drug (employing the BrdU (5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine) incorporation assay and tritiated thymidine incorporation assay, respectively, IC50 approximately 0.1-1 mM), whereas conjugates with the amide derivatives showed no activity. Furthermore, antiproliferative activity of the most active transferrin conjugate (i.e. the conjugate containing a benzoyl hydrazone link) was demonstrated in the LXFL 529 lung carcinoma cell line employing a sulforhodamine B assay. In contrast to in vitro studies in tumor cells, cell culture experiments performed with human endothelial cells (HUVEC) showed that the acid-sensitive transferrin conjugates of doxorubicin were significantly less active than free doxorubicin (IC50 values approximately 10-40 higher by the BrdU incorporation assay), indicating selectivity of the doxorubicin-transferrin conjugates for tumor cells. Fluorescence microscopy studies in the MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cell showed that free doxorubicin accumulates in the cell nucleus, whereas doxorubicin of the transferrin conjugates is found localized primarily in the cytoplasm. The differences in the intracellular distribution between transferrin-doxorubicin conjugates and doxorubicin were confirmed by laser scanning confocal microscopy in LXFL 529 cells after a 24 h incubation that revealed an uptake and mode of action other than intercalation with DNA. The relationship between stability, cellular uptake, and cytotoxicity of the conjugates is discussed.