G

Geza Horvai

Kiel University

Publishes on Head and Neck Cancer Studies, Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment, Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers. 5 papers and 4.9k citations.

5Publications
4.9kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Final analysis: A randomized, blinded, placebo (P)-controlled phase III study of adjuvant postoperative lapatinib (L) with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CH-RT) in high-risk patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).
Kevin J. Harrington, Stéphane Temam, Anil D′Cruz et al.|Journal of Clinical Oncology|2014
Cited by 26

6005 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and ErbB2 are overexpressed in up to 90% and 40% of SCCHN, respectively. L, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of both EGFR and ErbB2, demonstrates tumor responses in SCCHN. Methods: Patients with resected stage II-IVA SCCHN, with a surgical margin ≤5mm and/or extracapsular extension were randomized to CT-RT with either P or L. RT was 66Gy (2Gy per day, 5 days per week).100 mg/m2of cisplatin was administered on days 1, 22 and 43 of RT. P or L 1500 mg/day was given for up to one week prior to CT-RT, during CT-RT and for up to 12 months as monotherapy maintenance. Patients were stratified by nodal status, primary tumor location, geographical region and ErbB1 expression. The study had 80% power to detect a 10% absolute difference in disease free survival (DFS) rate (55% to 65%). Results: 688 patients were in the ITT population, 346 L and 342 P. Treatment arms were well balanced for prognostic factors. Median total doses of cisplatin (266.5 and 280 mg/m2, L and P respectively) and median doses and duration of RT were similar in both arms. At the time of unblinding, recurrence/death from any cause was seen in 35% in L and 32% in P by independent review committee (IRC): Median DFS (95% CI) L: 53.6 mo (45.8, Not Reached [NR]); P: NR (54.6, NR), HR (95% CI) = 1.10 (0.85, 1.43) 2-sided p value = 0.45. Investigator results confirmed the IRC assessment: HR 1.03 (0.81, 1.30), p=0.82. No significant differences were observed in DFS for any of the pre-specified subgroups, including HPV. Death occurred in 30% L and 32% P; HR (95% CI) = 0.96 (0.73, 1.25). At least one adverse event was seen in 99% L and 98% P (SAEs 48% L/40% P, fatal AEs 7% L/5% P). AEs seen more in L were those expected with a TKI: diarrhea 42% vs 12%, rash 49% vs 30%, vomiting 46% vs 35%. Decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction SAEs were noted in 10 (3%) subjects L vs 3 (<1%) P. Conclusions: In patients with resected SCCHN at high risk for recurrence, L, when added to standard therapy RT/CDDP, does not extend DFS. DFS in both treatment arms exceeded adjuvant CT-RT compared with historical randomized data. Clinical trial information: NCT00424255.

Das lymphoepitheliale Karzinom des Ductus nasolacrimalis - Bericht über einen Fall
U. Thalacker, L Takácsi-Nagy, Mária Gődény et al.|Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie|1995
Cited by 8

PATIENT: A 59-year-old patient with an extremely rare lymphoepithelioma of the nasolacrimal duct was treated with radiation therapy and chemotherapy. RESULTS: A complete remission was achieved. Serious side effects and late effects have, until now, not been observed. The patient has been free of tumor for two and a half years. CONCLUSIONS: With this case report, the authors wish to draw the attention of otorhinolaryngologists to this unusual tumorsite. They emphasize that good results can be achieved with a combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy, if surgery is not possible.