R. Mark Ghobrial

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy and is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. In the United States, HCC is the ninth leading cause of cancer deaths. Despite advances in prevention techniques, screening, and new technologies in both diagnosis and treatment, incidence and mortality continue to rise. Cirrhosis remains the most important risk factor for the development of HCC regardless of etiology. Hepatitis B and C are independent risk factors for the development of cirrhosis. Alcohol consumption remains an important additional risk factor in the United States as alcohol abuse is five times higher than hepatitis C. Diagnosis is confirmed without pathologic confirmation. Screening includes both radiologic tests, such as ultrasound, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, and serological markers such as α-fetoprotein at 6-month intervals. Multiple treatment modalities exist; however, only orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) or surgical resection is curative. OLT is available for patients who meet or are downstaged into the Milan or University of San Francisco criteria. Additional treatment modalities include transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, cryoablation, radiation therapy, systemic chemotherapy, and molecularly targeted therapies. Selection of a treatment modality is based on tumor size, location, extrahepatic spread, and underlying liver function. HCC is an aggressive cancer that occurs in the setting of cirrhosis and commonly presents in advanced stages. HCC can be prevented if there are appropriate measures taken, including hepatitis B virus vaccination, universal screening of blood products, use of safe injection practices, treatment and education of alcoholics and intravenous drug users, and initiation of antiviral therapy. Continued improvement in both surgical and nonsurgical approaches has demonstrated significant benefits in overall survival. While OLT remains the only curative surgical procedure, the shortage of available organs precludes this therapy for many patients with HCC.

IMPORTANCE: Ischemic cold storage (ICS) of livers for transplant is associated with serious posttransplant complications and underuse of liver allografts. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether portable normothermic machine perfusion preservation of livers obtained from deceased donors using the Organ Care System (OCS) Liver ameliorates early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and ischemic biliary complications (IBCs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter randomized clinical trial (International Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Portable Organ Care System Liver for Preserving and Assessing Donor Livers for Transplantation) was conducted between November 2016 and October 2019 at 20 US liver transplant programs. The trial compared outcomes for 300 recipients of livers preserved using either OCS (n = 153) or ICS (n = 147). Participants were actively listed for liver transplant on the United Network of Organ Sharing national waiting list. INTERVENTIONS: Transplants were performed for recipients randomly assigned to receive donor livers preserved by either conventional ICS or the OCS Liver initiated at the donor hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary effectiveness end point was incidence of EAD. Secondary end points included OCS Liver ex vivo assessment capability of donor allografts, extent of reperfusion syndrome, incidence of IBC at 6 and 12 months, and overall recipient survival after transplant. The primary safety end point was the number of liver graft-related severe adverse events within 30 days after transplant. RESULTS: Of 293 patients in the per-protocol population, the primary analysis population for effectiveness, 151 were in the OCS Liver group (mean [SD] age, 57.1 [10.3] years; 102 [67%] men), and 142 were in the ICS group (mean SD age, 58.6 [10.0] years; 100 [68%] men). The primary effectiveness end point was met by a significant decrease in EAD (27 of 150 [18%] vs 44 of 141 [31%]; P = .01). The OCS Liver preserved livers had significant reduction in histopathologic evidence of ischemia-reperfusion injury after reperfusion (eg, less moderate to severe lobular inflammation: 9 of 150 [6%] for OCS Liver vs 18 of 141 [13%] for ICS; P = .004). The OCS Liver resulted in significantly higher use of livers from donors after cardiac death (28 of 55 [51%] for the OCS Liver vs 13 of 51 [26%] for ICS; P = .007). The OCS Liver was also associated with significant reduction in incidence of IBC 6 months (1.3% vs 8.5%; P = .02) and 12 months (2.6% vs 9.9%; P = .02) after transplant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This multicenter randomized clinical trial provides the first indication, to our knowledge, that normothermic machine perfusion preservation of deceased donor livers reduces both posttransplant EAD and IBC. Use of the OCS Liver also resulted in increased use of livers from donors after cardiac death. Together these findings indicate that OCS Liver preservation is associated with superior posttransplant outcomes and increased donor liver use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02522871.

PURPOSE: To assess degree of macrovesicular steatosis with unenhanced computed tomography (CT) and correlate it with histologic findings in potential donors for living related liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two candidates underwent unenhanced CT within 4 weeks of core liver biopsy. An experienced liver pathologist, blinded to both CT and surgical findings, retrospectively reviewed biopsy specimens and determined degree of macrovesicular steatosis. A radiologist blinded to histologic grading calculated mean hepatic attenuation in each donor liver by averaging 25 region-of-interest (ROI) measurements on five sections (five ROIs per section). Mean splenic attenuation was calculated with three separate ROI measurements. Liver attenuation index (LAI) was derived and defined as the difference between mean hepatic and mean splenic attenuation. Body mass index (BMI) was determined for each patient. Linear regression analysis was used to correlate degree of macrovesicular steatosis with both LAI and BMI. RESULTS: LAI correctly predicted degree of macrovesicular steatosis in 38 (90%) of 42 cases. In four of four livers, LAI below -10 HU correlated with greater than 30% macrovesicular steatosis (unacceptable for liver transplantation). In nine of 11 livers, LAI was between -10 and 5 HU and correctly predicted 6%-30% steatosis (relative contraindication). In two of 11 cases, LAI overestimated degree of hepatic steatosis. LAI above 5 HU correctly predicted 0%-5% steatosis in 25 of 27 livers. In two of 27 cases, parenchymal hemosiderin deposition led to an increase in LAI into the normal range, despite mild histologically confirmed steatosis. Degree of histologic macrovesicular steatosis correlated well with LAI (r = 0.92) and marginally with BMI (r = 0.45). Of 27 potential donors with normal livers at CT and acceptable LAI levels, four (15%) were deemed poor donor candidates because core biopsy revealed subtle hepatic necrosis and nonspecific hepatitis. CONCLUSION: Although unenhanced CT quantifies the degree of macrovesicular steatosis relatively well, it may preclude a liver biopsy only in a small percentage of potential donors with low LAI (unacceptable degree of steatosis). Core liver biopsy is still necessary in the majority of donors with normal LAI to identify those with both fatty liver and coexistent hemosiderin deposition or radiologically occult diffuse liver diseases.