Molecular Predictors of Outcome With Gefitinib in a Phase III Placebo-Controlled Study in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerPURPOSE: The phase III Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer (ISEL) trial compared gefitinib with placebo in 1,692 patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We analyzed ISEL tumor biopsy samples to examine relationships between biomarkers and clinical outcome after gefitinib treatment in a placebo-controlled setting. METHODS: Biomarkers included epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number by fluorescence in situ hybridization (n = 370); EGFR (n = 379) and phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) protein expression (n = 382) by immunohistochemistry; and mutations in EGFR (n = 215), KRAS (n = 152), and BRAF (n = 118). RESULTS: High EGFR gene copy number was a predictor of a gefitinib-related effect on survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 for high copy number and HR, 1.16 for low copy number; comparison of high v low copy number HR, P = .045). EGFR protein expression was also related to clinical outcome (HR for positive, 0.77; HR for negative, 1.57; comparison of high v low protein expression HR, P = .049). Patients with EGFR mutations had higher response rates than patients without EGFR mutations (37.5% v 2.6%); there were insufficient data for survival analysis. No relationship was observed between p-Akt protein expression and survival outcome, and the limited amount of data collected for KRAS and BRAF mutations prevented any meaningful evaluation of clinical outcomes in relation to these mutations. CONCLUSION: EGFR gene copy number was a predictor of clinical benefit from gefitinib in ISEL. Additional studies are warranted to assess these biomarkers fully for the identification of patients most likely to benefit from gefitinib treatment.
Endoglin, an Ancillary TGFβ Receptor, Is Required for Extraembryonic Angiogenesis and Plays a Key Role in Heart DevelopmentJC70: a new monoclonal antibody that detects vascular endothelium associated antigen on routinely processed tissue sections.Dinah V. Parums, J L Cordell, Kingsley Micklem et al.|Journal of Clinical Pathology|1990 A new monoclonal antibody, JC70, raised against a membrane preparation from a spleen affected by hairy cell leukaemia, recognises a membrane bound glycoprotein identical with that of the CD31 group of monoclonal antibodies. The antibody stains a fixation resistant epitope on endothelial cells in benign and malignant conditions in a wide variety of paraffin wax embedded tissue. JC70 stained malignant endothelial cells in 10 angiosarcomas with more consistency than monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies to factor VIII related antigen (FVIII-Rag). In four cases of Kaposi's sarcoma the antibody stained malignant endothelial cells but not spindle cells. It is concluded that antibody JC70 is of value for studying benign and malignant human vascular disorders in routinely processed tissue.
Inducible nitric oxide synthase is present within human atherosclerotic lesions and promotes the formation and activity of peroxynitrite.Inflammatory cytokines associated with atherosclerosis may be capable of stimulating the synthesis and activity of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which could further influence the pathologic features associated with the disease. Although there is a certain amount of indirect evidence to support the presence of iNOS in atherosclerosis, there has been no definitive study to confirm this. This study has assessed the localization of iNOS within human normal and atherosclerotic vessels by immunocytochemistry, Western blotting, and in situ hybridization. Further, activity of NO synthase has been assessed by detection of nitrotyrosine, which is a marker indicative of the formation and activity of the nitric oxide-derived oxidant, peroxynitrite. In Western blots of crude homogenates of atherosclerotic aorta, the iNOS antiserum reacted with a band of approximately 130 kd (the known molecular weight for iNOS), but no such band was seen in normal aorta. Immunostaining and in situ hybridization confirmed the presence of iNOS in atherosclerotic vessels, in which it was specifically localized to (CD68-positive) macrophages, foam cells, and the vascular smooth muscle. The antiserum to nitrotyrosine reacted with a wide range of protein bands (approximately 180 to 30 kd) in Western blots of atherosclerotic aorta. The distribution of immunostaining for nitrotyrosine was virtually identical to that seen for iNOS and was present in macrophages, foam cells, and the vascular smooth muscle. In conclusion, these studies have demonstrated that stimulated expression of iNOS is associated with atherosclerosis and that the activity of this enzyme under such conditions preferentially promotes the formation and activity of peroxynitrite. This may be important in the pathology of atherosclerosis, which contributes to lipid peroxidation and to vascular damage.
Editorial: Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, and the Updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 GuidelinesDinah V. Parums|Medical Science Monitor|2021 Subjective narrative review articles have an educational and informative role in medical and scientific journals. Systematic review of the literature requires an objective and complete review of all available publications on an identified topic. Systematic review that undergoes meta-analysis aims to provide a complete and objective evaluation of all the published data. Data from systematic review and meta-analysis publications support evidence-based medical practice and are prepared as original research articles. These studies require a clear aim and detailed planning with registration and approval of the study protocol before the study commences. Systematic review and meta-analysis studies are designed, conducted, and reported according to mandatory guidelines. The number of these publications has continued to rise during the past decade. However, concerns with the quality of the studies have resulted in more stringent study guidelines. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, guidelines, reporting checklist, and study flow diagram from 2009 were updated and published in March 2021 as PRISMA 2020. The Editorial aims to present the roles and requirements of subjective narrative review articles, systematic review of the literature, and systematic review and meta-analysis, and introduces the revisions and aims of the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.