M. Dougados

Significant progress has been made in outcome measurement procedures for osteoarthritis (OA) clinical trials, and guidelines have been established by the US Food and Drug Administration, European League Against Rheumatism, the World Health Organization/International League of Associations for Rheumatology, and the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science. However, there remains a need for further international harmonization of measurement procedures used to establish beneficial effects in Phase III clinical trials. A key objective of the OMERACT III conference was to establish a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials. During the conference, using a combination of discussion and polling procedures, a consensus was reached by at least 90% of participants that the following 4 domains should be evaluated in future phase III trials of knee, hip, and hand OA: pain, physical function, patient global assessment, and, for studies of one year or longer, joint imaging (using standardized methods for taking and rating radiographs, or any demonstrably superior imaging technique). These evidence based preferences, achieved with a high degree of consensus, establish an international standard for future phase III trials and will also facilitate metaanalysis and Cochrane Collaborative Project goals.

OBJECTIVE: To develop criteria for symptomatic improvement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), using outcome domain data from placebo-controlled clinical trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: Patient data from 5 short-term, randomized, controlled trials were used to assess equivalence, reliability, and responsiveness of multiple items in the 5 outcome domains for AS treatment: physical function, pain, spinal mobility, patient global assessment, and inflammation. At least one measure per domain was responsive (standardized response mean of > 0.5), except for the spinal mobility domain, which was omitted from the criteria. We developed and tested candidate improvement criteria in a random two-thirds subset from the 3 largest trials and used the remaining one-third for validation. These 3 largest trials included 923 patients (631 receiving NSAIDs, 292 in placebo groups). We selected the multiple domain definition that best distinguished NSAID treatment from placebo by chi-square test and that had a placebo response rate of < or = 25%. RESULTS: Candidate definitions were changes in single domains and in multiple measure indices, as well as combinations of improvements in multiple domains. Worsening in a domain was defined as a change for the worse of > or = 20% and a net change for the worse of > or = 10 units on a scale of 0-100. Partial remission (for comparison purposes) was defined as an end-of-trial value of < 20/100 in each of the 4 domains. Among 20 candidate criteria, change of > or = 20% and > or = 10 units in each of 3 domains and absence of worsening in the fourth discriminated best in the development subset (51% of patients improved with NSAIDs, 25% with placebo; chi2 = 36.4, P < 0.001). Results were confirmed in the validation subset. Almost all patients satisfying the definition of partial disease remission at the end of the trial had also improved by this criterion. Among all 923 patients, improvement rates using this criterion were 49% for NSAID-treated patients and 24% for placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Although further validation using data from new trials is still needed, we conclude that we have developed a clinically valid, easy-to-use measure of short-term improvement in AS.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the interrelationships among different phenotypes, and their relationship to the HLA-Blocus, in multiplex families with spondylarthropathy (SpA). METHODS: We recruited 115 white French families, each of which had at least 2 members with SpA. Pedigrees were established. Clinical data and pelvic radiographs were collected. The HLA-B27 status of all patients was determined. Analysis was performed to determine the prevalence of SpA manifestations according to sex, disease duration, and HLA-B status, and to examine clustering of specific manifestations in subsets of families. RESULTS: We identified 329 SpA patients. Mean +/-SD age at onset was 24+/-9.4 years. The male:female ratio was 186:143, or 1.3, with few sex differences in disease expression. Axial manifestations and HLA-B27 were each present in 97% of the patients. Inflammatory bowel disease and HLA-B35 were overrepresented in the 7 families containing HLA-B27-negative patients. The frequency of radiographic sacroiliitis increased in parallel with disease duration. Peripheral enthesitis, radiographic sacroiliitis, and psoriasis were evenly distributed in the families. Clustering independent of age was only observed for peripheral arthritis, suggesting that specific factors may predispose individuals to this manifestation. CONCLUSION: Familial SpA appears to be homogeneous, based on the high frequencies of axial skeletal involvement and HLA-B27. The lack of clustering of most manifestations in families suggests that a predominant shared component, including HLA-B27, predisposes individuals to all forms of familial SpA, and that ubiquitous genetic or environmental factors contribute to phenotype diversity.