Armando Orlandi

Abstract Purpose: BRAF mutations are grouped in activating RAS-independent signaling as monomers (class 1–V600E) or as dimers (class 2–codons 597/601), and RAS-dependent with impaired kinase activity (class 3–codons 594/596). Although clinical, pathologic, and molecular features of V600EBRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are well known, limited data are available from the two other classes. Experimental Design: Data from 117 patients with BRAF (92 class 1, 12 class 2, and 13 class 3)-mutated mCRC were collected. A total of 540 BRAF wt mCRCs were included as control. IHC profiling was performed to determine the consensus molecular subtypes (CMS), cytokeratin 7/20 profiles, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte infiltration, and BM1/BM2 categorization. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier and log-rank test. Results: Class 3 BRAF-mutated mCRC was more frequently left sided (P = 0.0028), pN0 (P = 0.0159), and without peritoneal metastases (P = 0.0176) compared with class 1, whereas class 2 cases were similar to class 1. Hazard ratio for OS, as compared with BRAF wt, was 2.38 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.61–3.54] for class 1, 1.90 (95% CI, 0.85–4.26) for class 2, and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.51–1.69) for class 3 (P < 0.0001). Class 2 and 3 tumors were all assigned to CMS2-3. A higher median CD3/CD8-positive lymphocyte infiltration was observed in BRAF-mutated class 2 (P = 0.033) compared with class 3 cases. Conclusions: For the first time, different clinical and pathologic features and outcome data were reported according to the three BRAF mutation classes in mCRC. Specific targeted treatment strategies should be identified in the near future for such patients.

OBJECTIVES: Although emerging data suggest that zoledronic acid (Zol) may have different anti-tumour activities against a broad range of cancers, its effects on lung cancer remain largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the anti-tumoural and anti-angiogenetic effect of zoledronic acid in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We treated A549 NSCLC cells with zoledronic acid to investigate survival, cell cycle activity, anti-angiogenic activity and apoptotic responses to it. RESULTS: We observed that highest Zol concentration (100μm) caused arrest in G1 phase of the cell cycle and also induced different percentages of apoptosis in presence (0.9% versus 4.4%) or absence (2.4% versus 28.5%) of serum (P=0.0001). Zol concentration from 5 to 100μm for 2 days induced significant concentration-dependent cell death in adherent cells. Furthermore, Zol (10-100μm) induced dose-dependent reduction both of mRNA and protein expression of VEGF associated with parallel decrease in VEGF secretion in the culture medium. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results support a possible anti-cancer and anti-angiogenetic activity of Zol. Our data may not only provide a basis for the clinical use of this drug as preventive agent of bone metastases but also suggest that Zol deserves attention as an anti-cancer agent in non-small-cell lung cancer.