Arie Gafson

Interest in neurofilaments has risen sharply in recent years with recognition of their potential as biomarkers of brain injury or neurodegeneration in CSF and blood. This is in the context of a growing appreciation for the complexity of the neurobiology of neurofilaments, new recognition of specialized roles for neurofilaments in synapses and a developing understanding of mechanisms responsible for their turnover. Here we will review the neurobiology of neurofilament proteins, describing current understanding of their structure and function, including recently discovered evidence for their roles in synapses. We will explore emerging understanding of the mechanisms of neurofilament degradation and clearance and review new methods for future elucidation of the kinetics of their turnover in humans. Primary roles of neurofilaments in the pathogenesis of human diseases will be described. With this background, we then will review critically evidence supporting use of neurofilament concentration measures as biomarkers of neuronal injury or degeneration. Finally, we will reflect on major challenges for studies of the neurobiology of intermediate filaments with specific attention to identifying what needs to be learned for more precise use and confident interpretation of neurofilament measures as biomarkers of neurodegeneration.

Treatments with a range of efficacy and risk of adverse events have become available for the management of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, now the heterogeneity of clinical expression and responses to treatment pose major challenges to improving patient care. Selecting and managing the drug best balancing benefit and risk demands a new focus on the individual patient. Personalised medicine for MS is based on improving the precision of diagnosis for each patient in order to capture prognosis and provide an evidence-based framework for predicting treatment response and personalising patient monitoring. It involves development of predictive models involving the integration of clinical and biological data with an understanding of the impact of disease on the lives of individual patients. Here, we provide a brief, selective review of challenges to personalisation of the management of MS and suggest an agenda for stakeholder engagement and research to address them.

BACKGROUND: REFINE was an exploratory, dose- and frequency-blinded, prospective, randomized, dose-ranging study in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of natalizumab administered via various regimens in RRMS patients. METHODS: Clinically stable RRMS patients previously treated with 300 mg natalizumab intravenously for ⩾12 months were randomized to one of six natalizumab regimens over 60 weeks: 300 mg administered intravenously or subcutaneously every 4 weeks (Q4W), 300 mg intravenously or subcutaneously every 12 weeks (Q12W), or 150 mg intravenously or subcutaneously Q12W. The primary endpoint was the mean cumulative number of combined unique active magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions at week 60. RESULTS: In total, 290 patients were enrolled. All Q12W dosing arms were associated with increased clinical and MRI disease activity and closed early; ⩾39.5% of patients in each Q12W arm met rescue criteria. In the 300 mg intravenous and subcutaneous Q4 W arms, the mean cumulative number of combined unique active MRI lesions was 0.23 and 0.02, respectively; annualized relapse rates were 0.07 and 0.08, respectively; and trough natalizumab serum levels and α4-integrin saturation were comparable. CONCLUSION: Natalizumab 300 mg subcutaneous Q4W was comparable to 300 mg intravenous Q4W dosing with respect to efficacy, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and safety.

BACKGROUND: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) and slowly expanding lesions (SELs) have been posited as markers of chronic active lesions (CALs). OBJECTIVE: To assess the lesion-level concordance of PRLs and SELs in MS and to characterize changes in brain tissue integrity in CALs over time. METHODS: MRIs were analyzed from a substudy of AFFINITY [NCT03222973], a phase 2 trial of opicinumab in relapsing MS. Assessments included (1) identification of SELs based on longitudinal MRIs over 72 weeks, and identification of PRLs on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) filtered phase images at week 72; (2) evaluation of subject-level correlation of SEL and PRL counts, volumes, and degree of lesion-level overlap between SELs and PRLs; and (3) characterization of tissue integrity over time in overlapping and non-overlapping SELs and PRLs. RESULTS: In 41 subjects, 119 chronic PRLs and 267 SELs were detected. Of 119 (39.5%) chronic PRLs, 47 co-localized with a SEL; 46/267 (17.2%) SELs co-localized with a PRL. PRLs co-localized with SELs showed expansion and worsening microstructural damage over time. SELs with and without co-localization with PRLs showed ongoing tissue damage. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic MS lesions identified as both PRL and SEL were associated with the most severe accumulation of tissue damage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: AFFINITY [NCT03222973].